Even if they don’t have sex, people who work closely together inevitably become intimate.
Judgement can be clouded for all kinds of reasons. That’s also unavoidable in any complex understaking without rising to the level of malfeasance or negligence.
Even if they don’t have sex, people who work closely together inevitably become intimate.
Judgement can be clouded for all kinds of reasons. That’s also unavoidable in any complex understaking without rising to the level of malfeasance or negligence.
Yes. So in such a high profile case. Why? That’s idiotic.
They stopped having sex before the indictment. What’s idiotic is people thinking that two people who ever had sex before shouldn’t work together.