So…. because they aren’t the same user they can ignore the discussion that’s already happening and scream whatever they want! And I can’t defend my own points…?
Does that make any sense lol?
What’s wrong with asking them to address the discussion is about and what’s wrong with pointing out they aren’t adding to conversation…?
Or is this just a circle jerk thread that I waltz into? Do people really detest conversations? Because that’s what I’m trying to have here, but apparently everyone just wants wants to defend arrowheads shitty way of handling contract disputes.
What was illegal about Sony enforcing their contract? Please explain instead of going off on an irrelevant tangent, can anyone answer? Or are people just going to shout without backing anything up? If someone wants to claim something’a illegal, they should be able to at least explain when asked, but I’m the asshole for asking…? Sure lmfao how does that make any sense?
Nothing is illegal for Sony to enforce their contract with AH, *if" it was in the contract, which no one has explicitly stated it was, other than saying it came up in talks and was something Sony requested of them, whether enforced by contract is unclear without the contracts.
What is illegal is Sony selling games with the foreknowledge that it would be revoking access to those games without compensation. And yes, the publisher is in control of sales, not AH.
Also you need to learn that your can say anything and still come across like a toxic arsehole. Time is everything and difficult through text. I recommend you try and work on that.
Does that make any sense lol?
What’s wrong with asking them to address the discussion is about and what’s wrong with pointing out they aren’t adding to conversation…?
Or is this just a circle jerk thread that I waltz into? Do people really detest conversations? Because that’s what I’m trying to have here, but apparently everyone just wants wants to defend arrowheads shitty way of handling contract disputes.
What was illegal about Sony enforcing their contract? Please explain instead of going off on an irrelevant tangent, can anyone answer? Or are people just going to shout without backing anything up? If someone wants to claim something’a illegal, they should be able to at least explain when asked, but I’m the asshole for asking…? Sure lmfao how does that make any sense?
Nothing is illegal for Sony to enforce their contract with AH, *if" it was in the contract, which no one has explicitly stated it was, other than saying it came up in talks and was something Sony requested of them, whether enforced by contract is unclear without the contracts.
What is illegal is Sony selling games with the foreknowledge that it would be revoking access to those games without compensation. And yes, the publisher is in control of sales, not AH.
Also you need to learn that your can say anything and still come across like a toxic arsehole. Time is everything and difficult through text. I recommend you try and work on that.