HailSeitan@lemmy.world to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 5 个月前NYT's new TOS binds you to forced arbitration; opt out within 30 dayslemmy.worldimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageNYT's new TOS binds you to forced arbitration; opt out within 30 dayslemmy.worldHailSeitan@lemmy.world to Privacy Guides@lemmy.oneEnglish · 5 个月前message-square21fedilink
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前Someone please explain why I should or shouldn’t do this
minus-squareHailSeitan@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前https://www.consumerreports.org/mandatory-binding-arbitration/forced-arbitration-clause-for-concern/
minus-squarePlayer2@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前Companies only really have one reason to prevent their customers from taking them to court: they intend to break the law or otherwise harm their customers.
Someone please explain why I should or shouldn’t do this
https://www.consumerreports.org/mandatory-binding-arbitration/forced-arbitration-clause-for-concern/
Companies only really have one reason to prevent their customers from taking them to court: they intend to break the law or otherwise harm their customers.