A) class war informs all other wars. It is the root of most social ills. The owners literally stoke wars like these for profit and to keep us divided, and hello there, its working like a charm. Alice Walton would boil a thousand little girls and boys in acid if it made her an extra nickel. It’s just business after all, and that validates pretty much any horror.
B) problems should be addressed from the most severe. If we are wholly unwilling to tangibly address the largest problems, as we’ve proven we are, shrugging, walking over the dead frozen homeless lady’s corpse we could have fed, sheltered and saved, to say its too big and move on to try to help a woman in a home, with heat, with food, with a locked door, loudly feeling unsafe on the internet instead of prioritizing the next homeless lady that’s still alive but dying isn’t ethical.
We’ve proven we can’t do both, hell, we’ve proven we can’t do either as a society. So how will “fix each other” and “be better” as the moral hypotheticals as outlines for a larger problem solving strategy make progress for… anyone?
You need to read a bit more i think, or i missed when Marx said that the only way to fight class wars is helping homeless people (which again i support) and also i think i missed when it said that problems should be adressed from the most severe which means we need to forget about sexism and racism and low wages as long as we can “have a roof and a full belly” as you said.
I think i also missed when no one with half a brain said that it’s proven we cant do both.
I really think you are so full of yourself that even lost track of what class war even means, you need to stop saying so much that you disregard womens problem because there are homeless people, maybe you should touch a bit of grass and go to communities and see what are their problems.
A) class war informs all other wars. It is the root of most social ills. The owners literally stoke wars like these for profit and to keep us divided, and hello there, its working like a charm. Alice Walton would boil a thousand little girls and boys in acid if it made her an extra nickel. It’s just business after all, and that validates pretty much any horror.
B) problems should be addressed from the most severe. If we are wholly unwilling to tangibly address the largest problems, as we’ve proven we are, shrugging, walking over the dead frozen homeless lady’s corpse we could have fed, sheltered and saved, to say its too big and move on to try to help a woman in a home, with heat, with food, with a locked door, loudly feeling unsafe on the internet instead of prioritizing the next homeless lady that’s still alive but dying isn’t ethical.
We’ve proven we can’t do both, hell, we’ve proven we can’t do either as a society. So how will “fix each other” and “be better” as the moral hypotheticals as outlines for a larger problem solving strategy make progress for… anyone?
You need to read a bit more i think, or i missed when Marx said that the only way to fight class wars is helping homeless people (which again i support) and also i think i missed when it said that problems should be adressed from the most severe which means we need to forget about sexism and racism and low wages as long as we can “have a roof and a full belly” as you said.
I think i also missed when no one with half a brain said that it’s proven we cant do both.
I really think you are so full of yourself that even lost track of what class war even means, you need to stop saying so much that you disregard womens problem because there are homeless people, maybe you should touch a bit of grass and go to communities and see what are their problems.