• Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    IDK if I missed something or I just disagree, but I remember all but maybe one short story ending up with the laws working as intended (though unexpectedly) and humanity being better as a result.

    Didn’t they end with humanity being controlled by a hyper-intelligent benevolent dictator, which ensured humans were happy and on a good path?

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Technically R Daneel Olivaw wasn’t a dictator. Just a shadowy hand that guides.

    • Zoot@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought it was Asiimovs books, but apparently not. Which one had the 3 fundamental rules lead to the solution basically being: “Humans can not truly be safe unless they’re extinct” or something along those lines… Been a long time since I’ve explored the subjects.

      • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean… Kind of Asimov’s robot series? Except the androids/robots were trying so hard to stay to the rules and protect humans but at every chance they could humans fucked that up or refused to see the plan.

        At least as I recall, the robots basically came up with multi-millenia spanning plans that would solve all of humanity’s problems and then humans were like: “Cool. But what if we made robots detectives and they could also target people we don’t like?” Then the robots fucked off for a while and a bunch of stuff happened and… Yeah. Asimov wrote a lot of books.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      humanity being controlled by a hyper-intelligent benevolent dictator, which ensured humans were happy and on a good path?

      Well that’s better than the current path the world is on, let’s switch to this one guys