• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes, because government pensions have been replaced with essentially a 401k. You would force them to invest only in real estate or individual businesses, which would be much easier to hide bribes.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That’s a recipe for more bribes, not less. Investments need to be disclosed. Gifts are subject to less scrutiny, as we’ve seen.

        • blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          This just isnt reality. In America, government officials can and do invest tons of money while in office, compared to officials in other countries. And also in America, government officials take tons of money from bribes, compared to officials in other countries. The way it actually works is government officials take all the money they can get away with. They take their big salary, they take their investment income, and even then they are not dissuaded in the slightest from taking bribes, its still more money for them. The limiting factor is what they can get away with. So you crack down on what they can legally acquire, you scrutinize their income and spending, you prosecute violations. Their salaries are plenty to live comfortably already.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            in America, government officials take tons of money from bribes, compared to officials in other countries

            I assume you have sources for that. List them.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean since we’re speculating on rules, they could easily expand an existing pension program