It is disappointing, if not surprising, that the west’s response to the ICC accusations was to defend Israel despite its war crimes

Archived version: https://archive.ph/Br7gq

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Holy strawman gish galop, Batman!

    The author of the article effectively refutes all of your novel of deflection with ome sentence:

    The proposed charges are not about whether Israel can defend itself but how, that is, not by committing war crimes.

    Later on, he encapsulates the very thing that all of civilized society is based on:

    regardless of the perceived justness of one’s cause, it never justifies war crimes.

    Never. Under any circumstances. Ever.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      By kicking the bucket down the road? Leaving 2/3 of them left behind to rebuild so they can get revenge in 20 years? As long as both sides exist, they will fight each other.

      • DoYouNot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just straight up arguing for ethnic clensing and the complete expulsion/murder of an entire people, eh?

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not committing a laundry list of absolutely heinous crimes against humanity under false pretenses ≠ “kicking the bucket down the road”

        Om the contrary, the more Israel slaughters, starves and otherwise oppresses Palestinians, the more people are likely to be radicalized, leading to more terrorist attacks and perpetuating the endless cycle of violence.

        Ethnically cleansing Palestine of every single Palestinian (which is of course an indefensible war crime and would be even if it worked) like you suggest would not change that dynamic.