• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well considering the states choose the electors and the electoral college has no obligation to follow the will of the people, no, I don’t remember that.

      It’s been a big giant hole in our system since day one and the fact that we refuse to patch it means that was always intended to be an illusion of choice.

      • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m ironically pointing to SCOTUS saying that even if an insurrectionist cannot be president, and the state of Colorado has a law that the secretary of state must check eligibility, that Colorado cannot bar said insurrectionist, because reasons including a “patchwork” of the states and it must be Congress who makes this decision. I guess if the ballot in Georgia and Florida don’t have identical candidates lists, that’s a constitutional crisis?

        And I know it’s different but it’s not really. Ohio just wants democrats to stay home so Brown loses.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Looking at since the Electoral College has existed from Day 1 of our current constitution, no. Especially since only white land owning males were allowed to vote.

      It’d be a massive shock if states didn’t decide who won or who lost.