your clear, simple case is not a reflection of reality. there are an uncountable number of possibilities for what our future holds, and your myopic fixation on telling simple stories won’t make them any more true.
There are 2 competitive candidates for president. One of them WILL be president.
How you get there is a mix of direct and indirect actions. You do not seem able to grasp or refute that indirect actions can have an influence on the frontrunners.
you’re inability to tell the truth plainly and without hyperbole or fallacy has resulted in you spreading election misinformation. all I’ve done here is try to keep the rhetoric honest
your clear, simple case is not a reflection of reality. there are an uncountable number of possibilities for what our future holds, and your myopic fixation on telling simple stories won’t make them any more true.
Ok Dr strange.
There are 2 competitive candidates for president. One of them WILL be president.
How you get there is a mix of direct and indirect actions. You do not seem able to grasp or refute that indirect actions can have an influence on the frontrunners.
That’s on you.
you’re inability to tell the truth plainly and without hyperbole or fallacy has resulted in you spreading election misinformation. all I’ve done here is try to keep the rhetoric honest
🥱
Lemme know when you have an original thought
this is a great example of a thought terminating cliche
So not yet. No worries
this seems like pretty obvious trolling at this point
I stated my case, defended it, and provided conversational example of the position.
You deployed the “le redditor” debate club starter kit and now cry going foul. You even tried to directly misquote me and got called out.
Oopsie, sorry you bungled this.
this mischaracterization of the facts serves only to protect your ego. anyone who reads this thread will know exactly what happened.