• xlash123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The article updated it’s headline to clarify that it wasn’t all EV sales. You can edit your post title to reflect that.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    He’s begged the oil industry to come up with a $1b donation for his “campaign”, this is the reach around if they make it happen.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s a funny way to get the auto companies and unions in the three states Biden really needs to go all in on Biden.

    I’m confused. Both of them seem to be trying to lose this election.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why? Better margins on gas cars, I think industrial Michigan would love this because it means they won’t be squeezed into electric car manufacturing. I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets. The consumer may not like it, unions may not like it, but the companies could give a damn.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets.

        We’ve been subsidizing ICE vehicles for the better part of the last century. Famously, Bush Jr passed enormous tax cuts for SUVs and other “light trucks” back in 2003.

        Congress recently passed a tax bill, as proposed in President Bush’s economic stimulus plan, that offers a $100,000 tax credit for business owners who purchase any vehicle weighing 6,000 pounds or more when fully loaded.

        Because these rules didn’t require a business to exist for a minimum length of time or post a profit, car dealerships would help buyers spin up small businesses on the spot in order to avail themselves of the credit. SUVs flooded the market and have been a load on the national car fleet ever since.

        Now we’re pivoting to electric vehicles in order to stay competitive globally, and (fossil fuel endorsed) business magazines have suddenly started poo-pooing the idea of vehicle subsidies as unnatural. Curious.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, that corporate tax credit is also why the Ford F-150 is the most commonly purchased vehicle by millionaires and billionaires. It’s the smallest vehicle able to be classified as a work truck, to qualify for tax credits. They can basically deduct the entire cost of the vehicle on their taxes, because they purchase it through a shell corporation (of which they’re the sole owner and operator.)

  • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can anyone give a legit reason as to why EVs are bad? Because all I’ve seen is “they don’t make cool BROOM BROOM noise” and “they’re bad for the environment” which is only true because of oil and gas companies bribing governments to restrict green energy infrastructure

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      theres only two temporary reasons. 1. the environmental reason is less the gas vs battery situation, but more the EVs are heavy, and the biggest pollutant are car tires. this tied with US consumer obsession of SUV sized vehicles dont help.

      the other is not all places have an equivalent “gas tax” which is used for road maintainance usually for EVs since, well they dont use gas.

      both fixable problems but can be considered a problem

      • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I didnt know tires where the biggest polluters, I’m all for getting rid of cars in general but the public transit sucks which makes me think it’s just wishful thinking

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Isn’t it also that sourcing the raw materials for the batteries results in a lot of pollution, and the charging is often provided by coal burning plants?

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Isn’t it also that sourcing the raw materials

          This also leads to a shit-ton of attendant neocolonial shitfuckery - but nobody in the US really cares about that.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          No one burns coal anymore!

          But seriously I saw one model by energy portfolio per US State, calculating how long you’d need to drive to make up for the additional emissions during construction

          • all had a threshold where the EV came out ahead, lifetime emissions
          • a couple states with cleaner power, had a threshold as low as two years typical driving, then it’s all gravy
          • West Virginia and Wyoming were the worst, with high reliance on coal for power generation. The threshold was 14 years, so an EV would still come out ahead if it lasted its expected lifetime (Teslas are supposedly good for 15 years, 250k miles before replacing battery)

          WV and WY are heavy red, rural, sparsely populated states, so not a good scenario for EVs anyway. But there’s also a point there about how heavily polluting they are, how the efforts if like 379M to reduce our impact on the environment are sabotaged by less than 1M owned by coal companies

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        the tire wear thing was a very warped interpretation of a study. Tire wear emits more particulate pollution than exhaust does. Pollution from exhaust is primarily gaseous.

        If my math is right, about 2.6 million tons worth of tires are sold in the US annually. While co2 emissions from vehicles amount to around 1.5 billion tons. Even completely vaporizing every tire sold in a year wouldnt come close to tailpipe emissions.

  • graymess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump wants to ban all EV sales despite what Americans want.
    Biden wants to ban China EV sales despite what Americans want.
    About what we can expect from this stupid fucking election.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Biden wants to ban China EV sales despite what Americans want.

      No. Biden wants to enact protectionist policies that increase the price of Chinese EVs. It’s true that some Dems are suggesting Chinese EVs be banned, notably Sherrod Brown. There are actually some pretty good arguments for doing so.

      But I gotta be honest, if paying a bit more for a cheap ass brand new car is the worst of your concerns… well, I suggest you pay closer attention.

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No. There is no reason to protect the American auto companies. They sold out 80% of Americans to a policy of profiting off of selling fewer, more expensive cars in a world that they lobbied to make cars mandatory to exist in almost all of the United States.

        What about that closer attention ?

      • graymess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, you’re right. The worst of my concerns is Biden’s insistence on making us complicit in a brutal genocide for a fascist foreign power.

        Needlessly doubling the price of electric cars and bikes, collecting the difference as a tax on lower income Americans who would have most benefited from these much cheaper forms of personal transportation, while also posing as the environmentalist candidate, is just one example of the crock of shit we’re expected to participate in this year. Let’s just acknowledge that Biden is only here to defend and uphold billionaires, in this case, the ones who own the US car industry.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s some pretty good bait. I would have left out the part about paying their fair share for fuel and gas infrastructure because that’s a giveaway.

      The alternative to this style would be to come at it sideways as “let the free market decide, and it’ll die out because…” then list off some talking points about how much fun it is to roll coal on anyone on a bicycle.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          For anyone actually believing this, in Alberta the gas taxes go to the general fund. Vehicle registration, provincial income, and federal income taxes are where the vast majority of public infrastructure money comes from.

          Plus notice how this particular troll was unsubtle about moving the goalposts from fuel infrastructure to road infrastructure.

          In addition, now they’re talking about taxing them instead of outright banning them and using the weasel word “unless” while being incorrect instead of being authoritative and incorrect.

          Come on, this was worse than before. 2/10. Get your shit together if you’re going to troll.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re leading Canada in the race to which province can demonstrate the most short-sighted stupidity, that’s for sure.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I know it has been said, but who in the ever loving fuck can hear this and still support this dumbshit?

  • LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    God, now this makes it a difficult one.

    On one hand a Trump presidency is awful, on the other hand seeing Elon Musk have a mental breakdown as he can no longer sell Teslas in America is almost worth while

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Eh, it will never be accomplished anyway. Trump promised so much shit that never happened. Only some of his promises to rich people came true.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Meanwhile Biden just implemented huge tariffs on Chinese EVs. Trump is a corrupt fuck running his mouth in hopes to get more money from donors.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not sure what I would have done in Biden’s spot. China has a long history of ignoring patents, doing industrial espionage, and government funding an industry to corner the market on it, shutting everyone else out. We need cheap EVs, but that cost is so high.

      • 3volver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Then WHY in the world does the US import so much from China? Seems like a pick and choose bullshit take. The US is losing against China, they’re protecting US automobile manufacturers.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Far from my area of expertise, but my guess is because people can swallow lack of forward progress way better than they swallow going backwards. The current trade with China started back under Nixon, and Americans have gotten used to so many ultra cheap Chinese goods. I try to avoid products from China, and for some things it’s really hard, and it usually means paying double the price. If we cut off that trade or raised the tarrifs a lot, the price of so many things works skyrocket and people wouldn’t stand for it.

          • 3volver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            the price of so many things works skyrocket

            That’s probably all you needed to write. Keeping prices artificially low by importing so much from China is a failing of the US.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ok. Why?

    What’s this stupid crusade against electric vehicles really about?

    Don’t like them, don’t buy them, free market, right?

    I get that little D. Trump wants donations from the fossil fuel industry and ice car manufacturers for his campaign, but why is it that all the stubborn conservatives are all over Facebook hell-bent on shitting on every post about EVs when nobody is forcing them to drive them? What’s so scary about it? Progression? It’s going to happen and they’re going to like it.

    The funny thing is that when they eventually need to buy a car, they’ll buy an EV anyway, because that makes sense when they sober up and look at what is best for themselves financially. It’s soo fucking stupid…

    I have this aquintance who is into politics on the right wing who’s posting this shit all the time. However, both he and his wife drive electric cars. It’s like they just want to be hypocritical stooges hoping to outsmart everyone else, just using any excuse to shit all over the place thinking their friends will admire them or think it’s funny or something. But it’s actually sad. Who hurt them?