• shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’ll be more concise than that other guy, but everything he said is true. I’ll be happy to give my personal pet peeves, but in general; The rules are too convoluted and specific to be called simple (compare to Chronicles of Darkness where almost everything is done the same way), but don’t actually provide a structured experience and expects non-professional dms to just make shit up constantly (compare to Pathfinder, where there is a basic rule in place for almost everything).

    Personal grievances (these are also the biggest issues in bg3): bounced accuracy is objectively terrible and makes your character seem useless or generic (see the fighter beating the wizard at a knowledge roll) and makes combat boring. There is next to no character customization (combat options, social options, or just cool stuff) outside of reflavoring (pretending your longsword is a katana) I’ve played simple games and I’ve played complex games, but no game left me feeling like i had less choice than 5e.

    • raunchy_noodles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What’s the best alternative then in your opinion? I kinda like that there’s a bit of gambling but I agree that it could be less.

      If a barbarian rolls better than a wizard does dnd make it so the knowledge you gain is less if you roll with a less knowledgeable class? I feel like that could mitigate that issue.