• anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Confirmation bias on full display. Downvote all polls and discredit them if they show trump beating Biden. The other way around and they are credible polls and up voted.

    This is why we see no difference between BlueMAGA and MAGA

    • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Crazy how, in a country with 255 million (in 2020) citizens of voting age, more people will come out to vote against a wannabe dictator. What could possibly possess people to want to protect their rights, right!? Must be fake.

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Man, I’d love to be an American right now, they have to choose between a senile old man and a convicted criminal to be their leader. It sounds like it came straight from a comedy skit.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        And who flirts with nazism, abuses women, probably colluded with Russia and other autocracies and lies about everything.

        It isn’t really that difficult a choice if you can remember just a couple of things from his presidency.

      • Veneroso@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        You’re forgetting the one with brain fog due to brain worms, who drove his ex wife to suicide, and is an antivaxer.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Hey, there are some alternatives! Like senile old conspiracy theory man with brain worms.

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Also precludes him from military funeral honors, which means anything he does get is invalid.

      It means a lot to us that deployed that a draft dodging bitch like Trump would lose that entitlement. Oh, and if you vote for Trump, You support a draft dodging bitch so fuck you.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      According to the 538 podcast I was listening to, he isn’t technically a convicted felon yet. The judge has to approve the verdict and enter the final judgement first.

      They referred to him as a convicted felon-elect.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I wouldn’t exactly claim 2% polling gains as a big victory, tbh.

    I check fivethirtyeight and 270towin pretty often and it hasn’t changed much in the last 6 months. Still dystopian.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I wouldn’t exactly claim 2% polling gains as a big victory, tbh.

      Its preferable to the 5-pt lag he was suffering a month ago. But nothing to brag about. Hillary squandered a 10-pt lead in the month before the general election, as the media turned into a “Buttery Males” feeding frenzy.

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Polls don’t matter, especially this far out.

    Vote. Put pressure on politicians to do better. But more than anything. Vote.

    If the polls say he’s 100% going to win. Vote. If you’re in a state that goes blue every time for the last 100 years. Vote. If you’re in a state that goes red every time for the last 100 years. Vote.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I’m not going to vote for Biden until he stops funding a genocide. You cannot say put pressure on them and vote for them no matter what. They do not give a fuck what you think if you’re going to automatically vote for them. That’s why the uncommitted votes in the primaries scared them so much.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Oh look, another original take. You’re only the (checks notes) hundredth comment attempting to gaslight me into thinking I’m a trump supporter because I’m not blindly loyal to Biden. Not even the Democrats, Just Biden. And you guys accuse Trump supporters of being a cult.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Hmm… when 99 people in a room full of a hundred people suggest something-

            Maybe it’s best to not believe that one dude that disagrees with them.

            Spades are sometimes just spades. Regardless if they tell you they’re not.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Oh no, you’re only the thousandth person to tell me that. It’s so persuasive. Either I vote for the guy funding a genocide or the Boogeyman gets elected1!!111!!1

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            Yes, that’s the reality of the situation, whether you like it or not. If you don’t care if that happens, fair enough. But don’t try to say that not voting for Biden doesn’t help Trump.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              I didn’t say that. I said that at this point, months into this debacle, it’s obviously not persuasive to me. I am not willing to sell the lives of Palestinian children to make my life marginally more comfortable.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  I bet you don’t know who I am, what I went to college for, or where I was before college. Because you’re very wrong.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  27 days ago

                  You can’t get extra dead. Here’s the IPC’s take on Gaza right now-

                  The famine threshold for household acute food insecurity has already been far exceeded and, given the latest data showing a steeply increasing trend in cases of acute malnutrition, it is highly likely that the famine threshold for acute malnutrition has also been exceeded. The upward trend in non-trauma mortality is also expected to accelerate, resulting in all famine thresholds likely to be passed imminently.

                  Those kids aren’t going to be alive in November.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                Those children will die regardless of who you vote for or if you don’t vote at all. It’s a horrific tragedy that is completely out of anyone who isn’t in power’s control. So instead of worrying about that, worry about what you CAN control - preventing fascists from gaining more power and making things even worse than they already are.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  No a tragedy is a plane crash. A tragedy is a tornado directly hitting the school gym everyone sheltered in.

                  This is a war crime, a massacre, an act so vile that civilized countries have agreed it should not be done, ever.

                  And we do not have to be complicit.

          • cowfodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Vote for the guy that’s unfortunately not willing to break with decades worth of support for Israel or the guy who’s said he’d send in ground troops wins.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              There is actually a third option this time around, not that he’s any better with bird flu on the way. But no it’s never an either/or proposition. You are in fact allowed to leave that spot on the ballot blank.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Yet another fallacy meant to coerce votes for bad candidates. I’m not politically disengaged. This is a political choice.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                As long as you’re voting on everything else on the ballot, fair enough. Also, I’m hoping you don’t live in a battleground state.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Oh yeah. It doesn’t work if you don’t vote at all. They have to know they left those votes behind.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            That you think everyone here lacks intelligence enough to fall for that nonsense speaks volumes about your own.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              No I think you’re just being willfully ignorant because it’s easier and those dead kids are over there.

              • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                Right… the dead kids. The perfect hot button rhetoric to swing around when you want to really drive the point home that “biDeN bAaAD!!”

                You’re seemingly as textbook as one could be.

                • jhymesba@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  On top of this, you have the bigger picture. What will happen if Trump wins?

                  • It will get harder to go to college, as Trump works to gut Pell Grants and cap Stafford Loans.
                  • If you have gone to college, it will get harder as Trump will increase the monthly amount you have to pay and not reward you for going into lower-paying public service jobs.
                  • Gay marriage will be put on the chopping block.
                  • Laws stopping discrimination against Gays and Minorities will be repealed and/or not enforced.

                  This is just the most benign parts of Project 2025. It gets worse from there.

                  So, on top of more people dying, we’ll suffer here at home because of idiots like Maggoty here.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                So do you plan on doing anything about it, or just going to pout about it and feel good about not voting when those people get bombed harder?

                This is just virtue signaling. If you cared about the people you’d want to reduce the harm they’re facing, not try to moralize your bad choice on the Internet.

                • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  27 days ago

                  This is a two-way street though. You’d think the democratic establishment would also want to increase their electoral odds in order to reduce harm.

                  Like, the stakes are so high, and it’s so weird to see them betting the horse on Israel. It’s frankly irresponsible for Democrats to be playing politics like that at a time like this.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Classic Lemmy. They’re quicker to blame you than they are Biden for bad policy.

        A true optimist would suggest that Joe Biden could absolutely reverse course. It’s like they’ve all given up on that possibility.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Pretty much. I’m open about the fact that I would vote for him if he reversed course. Nope, still just shouting at me and calling me a trump supporter.

      • Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Mathematically, either Biden or Trump will win, with 100% certainty.

        As lamentable as it is for Palestinians, you drawing the line in the sand over foreign policy in Palestine & Israel will not help Palestinians. I would even go as far to say that Biden’s policy on Israel is marginally better than what Trump’s would be. The GOP is actively hostile against Palestine. At least with Biden we are getting (gentle) push-back on Israel.

        So, if it’s a given that either Biden or Trump will win, you have one of four options, depending on your political leaning:

        1. Liberal and vote for Biden. Helps Biden.
        2. Conservative and vote for Trump. Helps Trump.
        3. Liberal and don’t vote for Biden. Helps Trump.
        4. Conservative and don’t vote for Trump. Helps Biden.

        I don’t see any other option, but if someone has one - one that helps Palestine - I’d be interested to hear option 5.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          If the choice is genocide or genocide then it’s not a real choice and this election is not legitimate.

          • Wiz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            In spite of you saying it’s not a real choice, you seem to be choosing #3 or #4.

            Bold choice. We’ll see how it goes.

              • Wiz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                It is my categorization. But it’s a logical framing.

                I’d be interested to hear if there are any other logical possibilities outside the four I named.

                You might be making an illogical choice, and that’s ok. It is you, and you can make your own choice.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  25 days ago

                  The democratic party realizes it’s losing voters instead of gaining them and reverses course. And yes that requires being willing to carry out the threat of not voting for Biden in November.

      • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Cause letting the guy who wants to send in the us military to “wipe em all out” win is waaaaay better for those people you pretend to care about.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Hilariously that would give them more access to aid than Israel is giving them. Trump wouldn’t be able to stop the US military from distributing aid as part of its normal operations mode. As usual he has no clue how the military works.

          • braxy29@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            dafuq kinda nonsense is this? lesse, a president who supports wiping out Palestinians is better for Palestinians because then they get more aid?

            ???

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I see people saying their vote doesn’t matter when they’re in a highly partisan district, which is most of them.

      News flash: Even the dumbest politicians can look at arithmetic. If they see their margins shrinking, they’ll adjust. Or go full retard and double-down. And then get a worse beating.

      • Julian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Also local elections can be decided by one vote and can be just as important.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Typically more important for the average citizen. Federal changes may effect you in years, decades or never. Whereas your local politicians impact your day to day life.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            After trading leads several times, Simitian and Low each finished with 30,249 votes in the original tally, which was finalized earlier this month, shortly before the recount began. Liccardo finished with 38,489 votes, well ahead of the other two candidates.

            So the two runners-up were competing for who gets to lose in a run-off election?

            The attacks reached a fever pitch late last month, when a local prosecutor filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that Liccardo’s campaign illegally coordinated with “a newly formed dark money Super PAC to do his CD-16 recount bidding.”

            :-/ It’s not the votes that count, but who counts the votes.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I see people saying their vote doesn’t matter when they’re in a highly partisan district

        I see people saying it when they’re in heavily gerrymandered districts and deeply disenfranchised states. Dems have been playing the “Just go out and vote!” game in Florida for a quarter century, and Repubs keep finding new ways to yank the football. Even ballot initiatives don’t work, as the Florida gerrymandered legislature just reverses out whatever voting rights or decriminalization laws the public passes.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Okay, then protest. And also VOTE.

          Throwing your hands up in the air saying “voting doesn’t work so I’m not going to do anything” is just allowing them to dictate everything that will happen.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Okay, then protest.

            Throwing your hands up in the air saying “voting doesn’t work so I’m not going to do anything”

            Studying the history of the electoral system and the patterns of disenfranchisement isn’t equivalent to “doing nothing”. And in the end, you have to be rational rather than idealistic. When Vladimir Putin is counting the votes, you’re not going to vote him out of office.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              When Vladimir Putin is counting the votes, you’re not going to vote him out of office.

              Russians that literally live under Vladimir Putin risk their lives to protest. You have politicians that you admit want to become the next Putin but won’t say anything or of fear of pepper spray.

              There’s an internet meme about France surrendering. French politicians try to increase the retirement age and the population takes to the streets. American politicians try to take away your democracy and American citizens just roll over to expose their belly.
              It’s not the French that surrender at the slightest bit of difficulty.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                Russians that literally live under Vladimir Putin risk their lives to protest.

                So do American college kids.

                French politicians try to increase the retirement age and the population takes to the streets.

                French politicians have been squeezing the pension system since at least 2006, and the street protests have come and gone without discouraging new efforts to dismantle the system.

                Bully to them for trying, but without material control over industry, they’re all sound and fury.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Well said. People also need to take steps to ensure they have not been kicked off of voter rolls (the Republican dirty tricks just never end). I think sites like vote.org can help with that.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Polls always matter, you just have to understand polls.

      This is with third party options and show Biden up 2% which is probably close to margin of error.

      It doesn’t mean Biden has it in the bag, but it means his chances are improved.

      But Biden risks the same dangers Hillary did in 2016.

      People don’t really want to vote for them, they just don’t want trump. So there’s a risk if Biden is polling too well (I don’t think it will be an issue) people will stay home thinking they don’t need to compromise their morals because trump will lose.

      It’s a dangerous game, and we wouldn’t have to play it if we ran a candidate popular with Dem voters.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        The margin of error for polls six months out from election, if memory serves, is about 14%.

        I think people are phrasing this wrong: it’s not that the polls are worthless, it’s that it does not tell you what’s going to happen on Election Day in any real sense. They’re useful for watching trends and gauging short term changes and impact. They are useful for telling you how things are going. They do not tell you anything remotely useful about how things will be.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          Nor are they even remotely reliable to gauge things in the short term.

          The methodology of collecting this data can be so heavily bias that the pollers can get whatever result they’re looking for, if they’re pursuing a narrative. I could write a poll that leads the poll takers to just about any desired conclusion by choosing very targeted questions with bad faith multiple choice options, and by conducting the polls targeting specific demographics. It’s a trivial thing to do.

          Instead, you have to deep dive into the polling methodology, have a deep understanding of the quality of the poll operators, etc, to have any idea of if the poll was even trustworthy.

          I, for one, dismiss polls entirely. There is too much disinformation, too many bad actors, whose entire goal is to “prove” their own biases in favor of their narrative, that the amount of shit buries the truth. So it seems a pointless exercise to sift through the shit to find the nuggets of truth, particularly when good faith polling isn’t at all reliable in the first place.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Exactly, also the expert in the article says basically the same thing in more diplomatic language:

            However, speaking to Newsweek Todd Landman, a professor of political science at Nottingham University in the U.K., said it was “still too far out from the election” to read much into swing state polls.

            He said: “The race remains highly volatile, and it is still too far out from the election to make any firm conclusion from changing polls across these swing states.”

          • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            I mean Larry sabato just cited this stat days ago but I’m sure you’ll say he knows nothing.

            You can average the top performing polls to get this.

            • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Math is math. In order to calculate the margin of error you need to know the sample size. The number of months involved is not a part of the calculation.

              • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                Then it’s not margin of error, the predictive accuracy - whatever the term is - is far worse 6mo out from an election (5 now i guess) than the ones that are days or a week or so out. That’s the point. Polls now are useful but not for saying who will win in November. You may as well forget the top line numbers as soon as you see them unless you’re comparing them over time and/or looking at cross tabs for broad demographic trends, which is also limited but useful in some ways.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        So there’s a risk if Biden is polling too well (I don’t think it will be an issue) people will stay home thinking they don’t need to compromise their morals because trump will lose.

        That’s largely how Romney lost to Obama in 2012. Republican turnout sagged in a year when both candidates’ approval ratings were underwater. Mitt lost a bunch of midwestern states that a candidate like Bush or Trump could have won, thanks to his vulture capitalist career alienating blue-collar conservatives and his weird knock-off religion alienating evangelicals.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Whoever on your account team wrote this one is funny. They’re right. But I love how they wrote that Biden will poll well, when the other guy has been spending weeks saying how bad he’s doing.

        Consistency my guys. Get your stories straight. Especially if you’re going to comment walls of text multiple times every hour every day. Don’t make it so obvious.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      And VOTE DOWN BALLOT. If Democrats voted down ballot as frequently as Republicans do, the Republicans would lose House and Senate by a wide margin.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Don’t vote and help their much worse fascist opponents get elected instead, which will affect the general population, not the wealthy elites. That’ll teach them!

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            You’re correct. But they get fucked much harder one way than the other. It’s all about harm reduction.

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Harm reduction is a myth, people have been preaching harm reduction for decades and there’s been no reduction in harm. Quite the opposite, poverty has increased. Homelessness is at a rate not seen since the Great depression, income inequality is the highest ever recorded. The most percentage of people living paycheck to paycheck is higher than any other level recorded. There has been no reduction in harm.

              • Gigasser@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                Wasn’t homelessness during the great depression roughly at a percentage rate of 1.5% of the nation (upwards of 2 million people)? Are you sure we have a homeless rate not seen since the great depression? As for all the other stuff…yeah that’s pretty bad, especially the income inequality over the decades and decades.

                • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Let’s see. The government tells us that poverty is trending down for decades, yet the number of people living paycheck to paycheck has been increasing. The number of renters that cannot afford their rent has been increasing, homelessness is at the largest level ever recorded, but the claim is poverty is decreasing. Have you ever stopped to consider? Maybe they are lying?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    President Joe Biden has overtaken his Republican challenger Donald Trump in three battleground states, according to polls five months before the presidential election.

    In March, the incumbent and the former president won enough primary races to secure, respectively, the Democratic and Republican nominations in the 2024 presidential election.

    Polls have so far shown that the results will be tight as the pair are statistically tied in most surveys, or enjoying only marginal leads.

    However, speaking to Newsweek Todd Landman, a professor of political science at Nottingham University in the U.K., said it was “still too far out from the election” to read much into swing state polls.

    He said: “The race remains highly volatile, and it is still too far out from the election to make any firm conclusion from changing polls across these swing states.”

    “The Hunter Biden proceedings in Delaware are just underway and there is a very long time to go politically, with many unknown events that will have effects on voter preferences and choices at the national and state level,” he said.


    The original article contains 538 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      “The Hunter Biden proceedings in Delaware are just underway and there is a very long time to go politically, with many unknown events that will have effects on voter preferences and choices at the national and state level,” he said.

      And that has what to do with Joe’s electability?

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        If Biden’s son is convicted, it reflects poorly on Joe Biden. If Trump is convicted, it reflects poorly on Joe Biden.

        Essentially, everything is Joe Biden’s fault.

        • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          It’s Murc’s Law. People think Democrats are responsible for everything that happens in politics. To a lot of people, Republicans are just an obstacle that if Dems fail to hurdle, it’s all the Dem’s fault. Republicans have been broken for so long, many people have just written their agency out of politics entirely.

          • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            What other option do we really have? If there’s only one set of adults in the room, it’s their job to stop the children. If they just sit while the children start killing each other, then who’s responsible?

            I’m not saying it’s not the Republicans fault. I am saying, though, that Democrats really need to up their game if they want to save the country.

  • drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I find it exceedingly hard to believe that a conservative will not vote for Trump when it really comes down to the day. I think there are plenty that will say they won’t all the way up to that point though.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Realistically the best you can hope for is many of them opting to not vote at all.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      They don’t even think he’s guilty of any wrong doing, of course they’ll vote for him.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      There are plenty of Conservatives who aren’t voting for Trump, they just get drowned out by the extremely loud cultists. Just look up Republicans against Trump.

      • shasta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah the real surprise is why they are still registered with the Republican party when the party leaders clearly have thrown their support behind him.

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Because they find voting Democrat to be more distasteful, for whatever reason. I have to imagine the people who swing the swing states have to be a really interesting mix of uninformed and having close relationships with people from both major parties. Like they only know the ideas at super high levels, basically just the slogans and spokespeople. It’s all vibes.

          Or I could be way off, I dunno. World’s a wacky place

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            You can only vote in the primarys if you are registered with the party having the primary.

            They probably want to keep being able to vote within the Republican party.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              In my state, you can be independent and vote for either.

              But yeah, I voted in the Republican primary this time, to vote against Trump, even though I would have wanted Nikki to lose, but would rather risk that than Trump.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                Never even occurred to me it would be state specific. But now that you said it, it’s obvious. Thanks

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      There’s definitely going to be a shift back in his direction amongst the faithful as conservative media does its work, but the thing to look for is whether than holds for low-information “undecideds” who make up about a third of the electorate. Depending on how much his case stays in the media, how much it affects his own ability to reach voters (i.e., does he get sentenced to prison pending appeals? Does he end up under house arrest with a parole officer looking over his shoulder?), and if people like the Minutemen or Proud Boys engage in violence over it, people in the middle who might have otherwise voted for him on the basis of “economy feel bad, maybe different big man make economy feel better?” might continue to peel away from him, and that’s a greater risk to his chances than what the diehards will or won’t do.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      I think a substantial number of voters are going to hold their noses and vote for the shitty candidate their party presented.

      It’ll be interesting to see how many people stay home compared to prior elections. People are super political and angry for a variety of reasons, but the choices are awful.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Good. Let’s hope it keeps up. Polls this far out from the election can sometimes be… non-indicative of the eventual result.