“Are women bourgeois?” - A Man With A Funny Tie
Cripple. History Major. Vaguely Left-Wing.
Alt of PugJesus for ensuring Fediverse compatibility and shit
“Are women bourgeois?” - A Man With A Funny Tie
I hope that’s true, but I have my doubts.
Because I know what our common objective is and I just can’t care about the subtle differences.
Even when those ‘subtle differences’ result in being backstabbed and sold out and the entire cause being lost against a fascist enemy, great. Subtle little differences, like “We need to purge the anarchists and Trots” should be met with “We need complete and total cooperation with the people who want to purge us 😊”
The true meaning of a united front, huh?
You’re on Divide By Zero, you should be fucking familiar with how they fucked the anarchists and the Trots, and that most of their ‘aid’ was purchased, not given.
Soviets were the only ones who truly supported the Spanish democracy against the fascist.
Curious that their backstabbing the Spanish republicans was instrumental in losing the Spanish Civil War for the republican side. Strange kind of support.
It’s funny (or ‘funny’ if you prefer) that US Republicans are monarchists instead of republicans.
No one knows his darkest secrets anymore, except the brain worm, which consumed the memory
It’s all about asking the right people.
No, no, I was assured Hillary Clinton was Basically The Same as Trump and Both Sides Were Bad.
King Juan Carlos of Spain.
If it did, he could just outlaw felons from becoming President. SCOTUS doesn’t want that.
“I have ordered the military to detain Donald Trump in a Federal max security prison and destroy all ballots marked with his name on election day. This is not a change in the laws of our great nation, this is just an act that I am ordering to be performed in my official capacity as POTUS. God bless America.”
Solitary, for their protection.
Wow, and here I thought he was an old guy with a stutter getting flustered while a fascist fuckwad spewed inane garbage.
(wich is technically possible but would probably result in way more casualtys because hamas attacks fleeing civilians)
You do realize that Hamas are shithead terrorists, not Saturday morning cartoon villains, right?
But you putting Fighters as in Terrorists in quotes tells a story of its own.
The story it tells is that Israeli claims of accurate identification of Hamas militants is questionable at best.
You gotta need to source that claims, and by source i don’t want to see you taking the numbers of the hamas propaganda ministry or their Gaza health ministry, and i also don’t want to see any sources just repeating those numbers.
Is the IDF acceptable as a source? The IDF claimed 10-12,000 ‘fighters’ killed and a ~50% civilian casualty ratio - meaning by their own estimates, back in February, they’d killed 20-24,000 Gazans - or about 1-in-100 of the prewar Gazan population.
You are also kinda silent about the fact that Israel is literally self defending in a war not started by them.
I don’t give a fuck who started it. Genocide still isn’t an acceptable response. There’s a reason why support for Israel started high after Oct 7 and plummeted in the following months. And it’s not because everyone decided antisemitism was going to be the next hot thing.
While I’m aware of the ‘Lettergate’ scandal and have different conclusions than you on the matter, upon reflection, I’m being tetchy above and beyond even what I normally am because I’m in pain today. That’s no excuse for my dismissive rhetoric, and I do apologize.
And Israel isn’t doing genocide, they are just a little too reckless,
Literal genocidal rhetoric from Israel’s ruling government as they kill 1 out of every 100 Gazans alive before the start of the war.
Pretty sure they passed ‘reckless’ a while ago.
nobody is giving a F about turkey turning Syria and the region Kurdistan into wastelands because they want to eradicate the people there.
This may come as a shock, but discussions of Turkish attempts at genocide and ethnic cleansing of Kurds are actually quite a big deal amongst people who follow international politics.
No, because the people who like renewable energy are the same ones who are either:
A. Already voting for him
OR
B. Saying “It’s not enough!” and using that as a justification to usher fascism into power.
lmao, I mean, I don’t think it has any real chance of happening. But what stops it is Biden being Biden. If it were, say, a fascist in the Oval Office, the only question would be “Who do I ask to do this dirty work?”