This is a repost. Also, like, do we need to keep spamming Beehaw’s tech section with headlines that reference rape as like, a casual way to say that a company did something dishonest? Cause I’m not really into it.
Like, seriously, is there a creepier version of this headline?
Wonder if he’ll make a video about himself trying to change the definition of open-source?
Yeah, after that I’m not really interested in what the grifter thinks.
Is this what you’re talking about? Is AGPL controversial now?
When did Louis “Right to Repair” Rossmann become the bad guy?
You can read more about it here https://lazysoci.al/post/14401506
FUTO’s The Open Source Definition
Open source just means access to the source code. […]
What is wrong with this company? How do you have the thought and then follow all the way through with it, that you need an own definition of a commonly used word? That’s just being obtuse and annoying.
He called a liscence that doesnt allow redistribution that changes the donation link or copying the branding “open source”, which it is it’s just a bit more restrictive