• sabin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you believe Israel should not be entitled to at least some of the land they currently have, you are being antisemetic.

      • sabin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I fully agree. They dismantled their settlements in the gaza strip in 2005. They aren’t “exterminating” anyone as evidenced by the fact that the Palestinian population has done nothing but grow until the war they started.

        • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          keeping Palestinians in open air prisons, requiring travel permits to go between concentration camps, which are often denied, and controlling the flow of good in and out of those camps while allowing the systemic encroachment on the west bank is, yeah, extermination. add onto it an ai-powered murder campaign and we can all see history repeating

          • sabin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Open air prisons? With a population density less than that of a typical american city? Malnutrition wasn’t even a problem before the war. This open air prison narrative is just pure bullshit.

            As for “controlling the flow of goods in and out” you have absolutely no legs to stand on. Even with import inspections in place Hamas has been consistently firing rockets into Israel hoping to murder random civilians since their inception.

            • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Even with import inspections in place Hamas has been consistently firing rockets into Israel hoping to murder random civilians since their inception.

              this doesn’t mean israel didn’t have them under seige.

              • sabin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                The point is that Israel had a damn good reason to have the strip “under siege”.

                Did you expect them to just sit there and do nothing to prevent them from overwhelming the iron dome??? What the fuck is wrong with you

              • sabin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                “For years before the latest war, Gaza was subject to an Israeli blockade, backed by Egypt. Under the blockade, humanitarian aid, including food and commercial imports, was tightly restricted. Even so, levels of malnutrition among Gaza’s roughly 2.2 million people were low and comparable to those of countries in the region.”

                https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/11/world/middleeast/gaza-famine-hunger-crisis.html

                Straight from the mouth of a cretin who regurgitates the same bullshit talking points you do, so presumably you should have no problem trusting them.

                • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  it had been in decline since Israel walled them off and took all the good cropland, leaving them at the mercy of foreign aid, which itself is restricted by… you’re not going to believe this… israel

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              While Increased movement is a positive trend, it has not yet been translated into meaningful improvements in humanitarian indicators; a full lifting of the blockade is required, among other solutions to the root causes. As of July 2022, the food insecurity rate in Gaza was 65 per cent, up from 62.2 per cent in June 2021, and the poverty rate stood at 65 per cent, up from 59 per cent in 2021

              Gaza Policy Forum summary: Experts agree that Israel’s dual-use policy causes acute distress

              • sabin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                "a full lifting of the blockade is required "

                In other words “Hamas must be allowed to import whatever armaments they desire”

                Go check yourself into the hospital for brain damage if you think this is remotely tenable.

                If you wanted to argue that they should just allow more food in or something I might have been able to have a conversation with you but clearly you just want to see Jews being indiscriminately murdered.

    • Zenjal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you think anyone is so entitled to land that they can commit crimes against humanity without recompense, you’ve lost the plot. Is the land theirs? No idea and depends on who you talk to, cause quite frankly, the argument that they were there first means every American that isn’t indigenous needs to get out, and that’s not even a great 1:1 analogy. If they are indeed entitled to that land, there are waaaaaay better ways to goin about than bombing hospitals. Zionest are jus makin things worse for Jews in general, cause their religious fanatics that are sure in their crusade and the rest of us are either with them or against them.

      • original2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        But why wouldn’t you therefore return the USA to native Americans who also experienced war crimes, or perhaps Canada to the inuits

        • Zenjal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, if memory serves from what they told me on the heritage trip, the Israelis were kicked out pre Jesus, when they were defeated by… Someone ( me memory ain’t always the best) and said someone gave the land to a different set of enemies, bastardizing the name of enemies into Palestinians. So we’re talkin about a much longer chunk of time, like less than 500 vs 2400 years, and as far as I remember ( could be wrong) the Palestinians we’re the ones to kick them out, jus a different enemy. Also the indigenous people aren’t bombing hospitals and food aid in hopes of pushing whitey back into the ocean, but do I think we owe reparations to them, among others, including that of more land? Absolutely. Does this include if it were to displace me? Sure. It would suck but ya know, if it was done above board and peacefully, not much I can do. Anything involving war crimes though would instantly loose my sympathy.

      • sabin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Back when the British mandate was established the Jews purchased the land they occupied from the Ottomans. There isn’t really much cause to suggest war crimes were committed until after said mandate ended and all the surrounding Arab states decided to declare war.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s not what zionists are fighting for, and you know it. Any argument you make for Israeli statehood applies to Palestinian statehood as well.

      Further? Then state of Israel exists, and you can’t say the same about a Palestinian state, nor can you say Palestinians under Israeli rule have anything remotely resembling representation; while they’re being massacred in a genocide.

      Of course oct 7th was fucking awful, and evil. But so is the campaign in Gaza, the west bank and Lebanon. It’s patently offensive to basic reason to try and justify what Israel is currently doing.

      • sabin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Any argument I make stands for both sides? Then doesn’t that make you a hypocrite for disagreeing with the sentiment.

        I am saying jews should have some right to exist inside Israel. Palestinian leadership wants them all dead/gone. From the river to the sea doesn’t mean “lets share the land” in case you didn’t know.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Uhm. Your last paragraph is wrong.

          That’s Hamas. Who wouldn’t have nearly as much power if Netanyahu didn’t ensure they have the funds necessary to pose a semi-credible political entity… over a decade ago… specifically to disrupt Palestinian statehood and independence.

          So, once again: Zionist’s are militantly opposed to Palestinian statehood, your argument is a bullshit red herring because Israel already has that and is currently the one committing fucking genocide to see that Palestinians never get it.

          • sabin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The last paragraph is not at all wrong. Lots of people other than Hamas want Israel to completely cease existing as a state. If you disagree with the sentiment that Israel should be able to have SOME land (and by extension the fact that chants like “from the river to the sea” are antisemetic) then you yourself are one of them.

            Hamas was the official party recognized by Palestinian voters. If you have an issue with Israel acquiescing to their demands in order to maintain some sense of stability then you have no right to suggest they intentionally tried to sabotage relations.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Hamas was recognized by plurality vote (and substantially less than a majority,) in 2006- over fifteen years ago.

              Of the people that would be eligible to have voted in ‘23, less than half of them were even able to votein ‘06.

              Nice try at painting Hamas as democratic.

              And once again you are fucking defending a sovereign state that is committing genocide for the sole purpose of- a state that already has that sovereignty you seem to believe they don’t.

              It’s patently obvious that you are full of bullshit. Are you really saying that some Palestinians being extremists justified the genocide Israel is currently committing?

              Are you really trying to say that Israel has the right to exist- and indeed are a sovereign state, but that Palestinians don’t? Because Israel is the one actively committing genocide, and has denied Palestinians representation for over 70 years, and whose current elected government is actively ensuring can never have representation.

              • sabin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                There is no genocide you worthless liar. The population of Palestine did nothing but increase until the war started. If Israel really wanted to genocide them all they would have all been carpet bombed dead mamy years ago and we both know that.

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          From the river to the sea doesn’t mean “lets share the land” in case you didn’t know.

          Likud Party knows!