There’s a weird part of me that wants this to work only if trump goes to prison anyway. I just want him in there fuming about his friend being out.
“I’m guilty of things I did to help Trump last time he was in office, and I should be let off because I’m instrumental in helping Trump get into office again”.
Employment is not a preclusion to imprisonment. If he wanted to stay out of prison maybe he should think about that before breaking the law and ignoring a congressional subpoena. If he didn’t want it to happen during an election why did he appeal for 2 years first?
Because he wanted it to happen during the campaign/election. They’re doing this shit on purpose.
That’s a bingo.
Yet another lawsuit they’re queuing up for why Trump lost again.
That’s why he needs to be in prison, in the cell right next to Trump.
“Keep me out of prison so I can be allowed the opportunity to do the same kinds of shit that got me in this pickle in the first place”
Stick that bastard down the deepest pit available so frump can go downwith him
Lock him the FUCK UP.
Maybe it should be the opposite. The waitress at Denny’s is not exactly in a position of power so keeping them out of jail is no great risk to the public. Someone working on a campaign for president, and presumably could hold a White House position, is far more dangerous. The degree of power is the degree it should be regulated.
Didn’t Trump just have a meeting with his probation officer where he had to confirm he wasn’t associating with criminals?
Lmao what exactly does he bring to trump’s campaign? The dude is a waste of space/time/life.
He seems to do a pretty good job creating rage media. Trump needs the hype and Bannon runs the shit shop.
Her should just do like that one lawyer just did and ask if he can share a cell with Trump to keep working on his campaign.
How hard did the judge have to try to hide their laughter?
“The government seeks to imprison Mr Bannon for the four-month period leading up to the November election, when millions of Americans look to him for information on important campaign issues,” Bannon’s lawyer wrote.
Pretty sure that he can hire someone to post on Breitbart for him.
If Trump is on probation, can Bannon even associate with him? Typically, you can’t associate with criminals while on probation right?
I swear the US is fucked at this point. We’re watching the collapse of the American empire in real-time. I expect a USSR style split in my lifetime, and a whole lot of upset rubes who thought that they could just pretend reality didn’t exist and things would go well for them.
I just don’t know which state(s) are going to split off first. Will it be the western states together, a handful of north eastern states, or will some bastard grouping of southern states decide they’ve had enough. Stay tuned!
One of the problems I see is that distilling it down more granularly at a state level is you have a huge urban/rural divide. That’s something you just can’t draw a clean line around. You would see a much messier civil war because it’d be “cities against farms”, not just state against state. That’s just one of the many, many issues that would arise.
The divide isn’t between states, though. It’s more rural vs urban, and that doesn’t divide up well into individual countries. Illinois and New York, for example, will still be a core liberal city dominating their conservative rural areas. Likewise, Texas will still be a few core liberal cities dominated by conservative rural areas. There’s not a good way to break any of those cases up.
I expect a USSR style split in my lifetime
“Balkanization” is the word, in case you’re wondering
I was aware, but most people are not familiar with it so I dumbed it down.
I’ve been thinking about this for a long time. I’m quite interested to see how the national debt gets divided up and how that influences things.
When the USSR broke apart, the Russians made an international agreement to pay back some of the debt. Pretty much entirely so that at least some creditors would have confidence enough to put more money in.
So probably something similar.
That’s what I mean, the states would have to come to an agreement on what everyone’s share is. I don’t expect every state to agree to pay $680 billion.
We can’t split up, all too interdependent. For example, I see people on here telling the red states to fuck off to themselves. Good luck eating food.
How about military presence? Trying to split down on that is a hard stop, not even thinkable. The federal government ain’t going to allow it, no matter what.
Any Southerners wanting to try again are getting stomped far faster than last time. Even then, you got armed libs like me embedded in the countryside. And yes, it’s worth my life to shoot at “red shirts”.
A third of vegetables grown in the US come from California and an even higher percentage of fruits and nuts.
Yep. Though until California can pull pure water from salt water, Utah will stop water from coming in. Though in Colorado, we’ll just block it off before it gets there as we battle out our own red vs blue. Fuckem.
Good luck growing anything after succeeding. It would severely limit California’s access to the Colorado river and considering California is already in a water crisis being self sustainable wouldn’t last very long
You’re assuming that if they break apart, they wouldn’t trade with each other anymore. That’s not what happened with the USSR, and it’s not what happened with Brexit, and it’s not what would happen if the US split apart.
The federal government won’t be able to do jack shit if California, Oregon(maybe not), and Washington decide to stop giving it money. Sending in the military wouldn’t work, there’s far too many conflicts of interest within the troops. People who were born there, or have family there, or friends.
Seceding from the union is illegal. They would just arrest the organizers in the state government and replace them with acceptable politicians to bring them back in line.
Ah yes, that’s definitely stopped countries from breaking up before.
Yeah, it stopped the United States from breaking up before. What better case study than the exact same scenario. Just this time its a much much stronger union army against a much much poorer economic system for the seceding army.
Other countries would not supply the secessionists with any military equipment and they almost certainly wouldn’t purchase any products from them either. International sanctions against the seceding states would end the “war” before it even began.
I think you fail to realize how big and important of a country the west coast of the US would be if it broke off. Countries wouldn’t have an option on sanctions, because the headquarters of some pretty foundational companies are located there (Microsoft, Apple, Google, Netflix, etc.)
California, Oregon, Washington together could split off, and it would be the third largest economy in the world behind only the remaining US and China.
It wouldn’t be as ugly as you assume, the rest of the country would kind of be forced to accept it. It would look far more like Brexit than the US civil war.
Seceding from the union is illegal, unless we all agree that this is going to happen.
But there’s plenty of other geographical issues with this idea. It’s hard to draw lines around liberal cities and conservative rural areas.
More than half of everything grown in this country goes to agriculture.
Go fucking vegan!
Do you mean livestock?
si papi
no, it doesn’t.
You’re right – its even more!!
that’s not the amount of food we make: that’s land use. much of it is grazing land.
