• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’m sorry but do you hear yourself? A multi billion dollar company is not incentivised? To what? Follow the law? Tying is not allowed… The fact it’s hard should not be a factor. It’s also not as if they have not had some time to fix this issue already. But as you write, there is no profit in it (following the law).

    But this is the essence. It is not profitable to follow some laws, and if a company chooses to not follow it. They have been told by their lawyers this is a potential liability many times. Then you bring down the hammer.

    • weebkent@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Oh my mistake, when I read it I thought it was “of course you buy DLC on Steam, where else would you get it” rather than interpreting it as a hard rule they have. Oops.

      Still I think my point still stands in terms of tying existing in a more substantial way. I’m not against tying because that’s a good practice. I got burned by Muse Dash not syncing DLC between Steam and other platforms.

      Also some quick thoughts, but I assume this tying rule is to prevent DLC duplication? Like, you get a DLC from some place and get the same one on Steam. And to my knowledge, War Thunder skirts around the issue of DLC tying by having a webstore and that’s a pretty big game, though I’m not sure they necessarily count as DLC…

      I wrote this at 5 am, so sorry if I don’t manage to bring my point across properly.