• spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    the reporting on this could be better which sucks because it’s obvious it’s going to be memeified for months now

    was this actually a church sponsored event or was it just being hosted in the building as a venue?

    not coming at this with any assumptions or narratives i just wish there was more reliable original data than some twitter links i can’t look at without an account :/

    • YerbaYerba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The pastor agreed to it after being contacted by the trump campaign. here with the pastor’s explanation

      • Shadehawk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s still pretty damned telling no black people came to their own church to hear him talk.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        ugh bless you thanks so much

        edit, my take: wow that pastor seems like an upstanding guy and i would be nervous for his decision if i didn’t have hindsight and see it played out in a way that clearly only showed his guest’s hypocrisy.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      TBH the less I hear about Trump aside from his prison sentence, the better. He’s not POTUS, there are real issues to talk about.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      What media companies are you talking about? You mention there are some righteous ones but they’re too few and far between. All of the other ones are owned by like 5 right wing billionaires. Those few and far between ones are all we have.

    • SOMETHINGSWRONG@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s pretty interesting how you somehow turned this into a both sides hyperbole.

      So you go on this rant about how mainstream media has assisted the slide into fascism, how Democrats will be the savior or free speech and ethical journalism.

      I seem to have missed what the DNC have done to fight back against this slide into fascism for the past 50 years. In fact they actively helped Trump get elected because he’d be easier to beat.

      Can you explain what Democratic leaderships plan is to right the list and get this country functioning again?

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        How do you mentally take rage about the current state of journalism actively ignoring and encouraging Republicans bad behavior to mean “both sides”?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        And here you come, saying they are both bad and we shouldn’t concentrate on Trump and instead “what about the democrats!”

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The Satanic Temple come off as solid Democrats if not anarchocommunists or something. If it was a Satanic house of worship, it could possibly be the Church Of Satan (who, at least in Anton LaVey’s time, were dominance-oriented Ayn Rand assholes philosophically indistinguishable from today’s Republican Christianity), or if they’ve mellowed in their old age, the Order of Nine Angles (who, conveniently, are also neo-Nazis).

      • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The Satanic Temple stands against pretty much everything Trump and his cultists stand for, as well as the big money Democrat establishment.

        Definitely not ancoms.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      not really

      Traditionally, men should remove their hats during prayers or hymns, whereas women might choose to keep their decorative hats on. However, this practice can vary greatly depending on the denomination and local customs. Observing other attendees and being aware of the norms can help you navigate this aspect with grace. src

      given this wasn’t even a service, but just using the space as a venue, i will say that the hats are the least disgusting thing happening in the image

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have no love for his staff, but why is sitting on a couch with your shoes off bad, especially in a high-stress environment?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That would be a different couch from the ones I’ve ever owned.

            Sitting sideways on a couch reading a book is quite comfortable and plenty of people (myself included) don’t wear shoes or socks at home, especially in the summer.

    • outer_spec@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      99% of “normal etiquette” is just a bunch of outdated rules that make no sense. If even the “return to tradition” crowd is starting to feel comfortable wearing hats to church, it may be a sign that nature is healing.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      None of the people wearing a hat in that picture would be able to spell etiquette without a K. They love their Ks.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not if the hat wearer bears the mark of the devil on their forehead

        We don’t need to see the MAGA mark on their forehead to know its there. The hat on top of it already says MAGA.

  • Shadehawk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sorry but should a church housing a political rally and supporting a political figure not be all sorts of illegal if theyre tax exempt?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The claim was that it was a roundtable discussion that Trump was a part of.

      But of course, every Trump public appearance is a Trump rally.

        • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m sure there are exceptions for when you have to cover up your extramarital affairs with pornstars, when you reeeeeeally wanna keep some top-secret documents for personal use, when you make your money by defrauding others or just feel like keeping people in permanent fear so that they turn to you for salvation. After all, the constitution, which he has very much read, says that he can do absolutely everything with absolute impunity.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        A claim that isn’t true and made knowingly is called a lie.

        But also any time his lips move and words are produced, they are also called lies.

  • fah_Q@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Funny if you to believe any of these clowns have seriously been in a church before.

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      “In the ordinary moral universe, the good will do the best they can, the worst will do the worst they can, but if you want to make good people do wicked things, you’ll need religion.”

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Problem is that if you even read the Gospel of Luke or even Matthew alone, it basically already contradicts a lot of Trumpian rhetoric

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nice way to cherrypick the verse and remove context 🤦

            It’s part of a wider account of Thomas literally seeing the risen Christ in front of him and still not believing. So Thomas insists that he touches His wounds. And this is simply Jesus’ response blessing him who believes what he saw with evidence, but also blessing those who haven’t witnessed the resurrection and risen Christ.

            So He blessed two groups of believers: Those who critically investigate the resurrection narrative, and those who didn’t feel the need to.

            I, personally, fit into the former category.

            • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
              link
              fedilink
              Svenska
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Nice way of accusing me of removing context while doing it yourself.

              Assuming that what is written is true - and not just a folk tale like the Little Red Riding Hood, which is more probable - and that this specific God exists and became his own son and then died and got resurrected.

              If we take into account the context that this text has been written several hundreds of years after it happened, anyone alive back then and also today can *only* be one of those who believe without seeing, because we can’t go back in time to experience it ourselves like Thomas or the other apostles did.

              So, we can’t be the one “who believes what he saw with evidence”. And we can only be “those who haven’t witnessed the resurrection and risen Christ”. And this is one of the fundamentals of any religion, but especially Christianity where you have to believe in Christ otherwise you will go to hell.

              There is also the subtle nuance that if there is evidence then you don’t need to believe, you just know.

              With this context, at least I come to the conclusion that “religion demands you to go against evidence and just believe”, otherwise you will go to hell, which nobody wants.

      • fah_Q@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Trump people only “identify as religious” they aren’t the terrible people that traditional attend and hate. Lol I’m sure there is a slight overlap in the Venn Diagram.

        • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I live in the Bible belt and can tell you: the evangelical megachurches are chock full of Christian nationalists.

          Sure, there are factions in the GOP that don’t really care about religion , but the SCOTUS wouldn’t have overturned Roe if the hardcore religious zealots didn’t work for decades to get it done.

          The protesters at abortion clinics were bussed there by the churches a lot of the time; they’re not outliers here. They are the engine that runs the party here in Texas.

      • wieson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So you want god to do the work, that you’re supposed to do? Do we live in a democracy or a theocracy?

          • wieson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s meant for both of these statements. Do we expect god to turn trump into ash or is it our job to build a good society?

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              “God helps those who help themselves”

              “God works through us”

              “God chooses imperfect vessels.”

              Sorry officer it wasn’t me who threw gasoline on Trump and lit him on fire. God just works in mysterious ways, ya know?

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                "God gave me a high powered sniper crossbow for a reason, officer. I just made sure His Will was done by executing 5 obviously criminal SCOTUS “justices.”

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            The implication of GP is that it’s our job to turn Trump to ash (and I think that’s the intended interpretation).

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If the USA is a country that is a democracy, can be answered only by a tentative yes for now. There are too many things wrong with the voting system and disenfranchisement and systemic failures around court appointments for a definitive yes.

          Apart from that, we live in a world where gods don’t exist, but not everyone agrees on that.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, I can see many people in there who are not perfect representatives of the Arian Race (people whose hair is not blond enough or whose eyes are brown rather than blue), so they should be counted as black, thus making this a mixed race audience, most of which are black.

    /s

  • bitchkat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    He meant black as in its painted black not that it’s predominantly attended by black people.