Thinking about this because of a greentext I saw earlier complaining about OF models.

It feels like a lot of the stigma surrounding sex work in the modern day (that doesn’t just boil down to misogyny/gender norms/religion) is based on the fact that selling intimate aspects of one’s self places a set value on something that many see as sacred; something that shouldn’t have monetary value.

Not to say anything about the economic validity of a society without currency, but I think that, hypothetically, if that were to exist, sex work would be less stigmatized since this would no longer be a factor. Those engaged in sex work would be more likely to be seen as doing it because it’s something they are good at/enjoy, and less because it’s an “easy” way to make money, as some think. It would also eliminate the fear of placing set value on social, non sex-work related intimacy (not that those fears were well-founded to begin with).

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    cake
    OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    There can be other forms of compensation in currencyless societies, so not necessarily. There’s also just the personal fulfillment aspect, which is supposed to be the main thing motivating people to work in this hypothetical.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      So instead of being a ‘whore’ for money, Jane can be a ‘whore’ for a meal? Or a whore for a new dining set?

      Unless we are in a post scarcity world there will be ‘currency’ even if it’s not ‘money’.

      Anything that made sex transactional would just be more of the same old shit we see today.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It seems like you mean a post-scarcity society rather than a currencyless one. Sex work done to earn a living is still done to earn a living if it’s in a society that distributes goods and services in another way. I’d hope that the sex worker in question is getting personal fulfilment from it, but unless their basic needs are covered regardless then it seems foolishly optimistic to assume that it’s the case

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s also just the personal fulfillment aspect,

      Yeah, that’s the reason lots of people have sex for no money…

      Like, if there’s no money changing hands, it’s not a free prostitute, it’s just someone willing to have sex with you

      It doesn’t make any sense to still call them a prostitute.

      • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
        cake
        OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        It does if they formally define it as their career path and treat it as such.

        Sex work is more than just having sex with people for fun. There’s layers, specializations, and skill to it. Not all of it is strictly physical. Someone might want to just go on a date after their spouse passed away, for instance. Handling that situation requires a lot of emotional maturity and your skill in those situations improves with experience.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          So. In your eyes…

          Are they having sex with everyone that asks?

          Or are they only having sex with people they want to for no money, like literally every other human?

          Because the more you talk, the more it’s feeling like you want a society with public sex slaves.

          If there’s no sex, why are you calling them sex workers? In your example, it’s just sympathy dates?

          Seriously, none of what you’re saying makes sense. And I know this is a sub for ideas that aren’t thought out… But still bro

          • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
            cake
            OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Other commenter is right, I was thinking more things like creating pornography or sex surrogacy, things that people would find fulfilling and choose to do irrespective of what incentives may or may not be on offer, and would qualify as more traditional “work”.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              things that people would find fulfilling and choose to do irrespective of what incentives may or may not be on offer

              Again, people already do that for free…

              Just with people they choose to.

              So either you’re advocating for sex slaves who feel obligated to do so with anyone, or it’s just still normal sexual/romantic activities.

              • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
                cake
                OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                I don’t agree, I think it’s possible to compartmentalize certain sexual activities as not romantic and also not obligation-based, while still being fulfilling and work-related in a post-scarcity society. Like helping clients overcome sexual insecurity or barriers with sex surrogacy, for instance.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            While I agree with you that I don’t think OP has correctly described what they’re actually thinking about, there is plenty of sex work that doesn’t involve actually having physical sex with anyone. Like a solo porn model, or erotic dancers