• FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Some of us aren’t against GMOs for being genetically modified, we’re against patents on food.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m also against patents on food but this is a bad argument. GMOs are artificial and can reasonably be patented under the same rules as any other technology.

      Patents in general must be abolished.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        If I could fucking ban pesticides and antibiotics for agricultural use I absolutely would.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well, yes, but also if I actually had the power to make that change I would do it gradually through a market system for exactly that reason. One can dream, though.

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              One small change, Market systems are prone to market failures. They’re also rather inefficient, because there needs to be inefficiencies or else there’s no profit.

              No, the best path to reducing pesticides and the over reliance on fertilizer is regulatory, with people on the ground checking compliance. Our food supply is too important to be left to the inefficiencies and corruption of “market solutions”

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                You need to have a role for the market. Central planning is a demonstrably bad idea.

                But a heavily regulated market is the sweet spot.