I recently saw a comment chain about nuclear bombs, and that led me to thinking about this. Say there is a nuclear explosion in the downtown of my US city. I survive relatively fine, but obviously the main part of the city has been destroyed, while major zones extending from the center were also badly damaged. What would be a good response to (a) survive and (b) help out the recovery effort?

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Great questions, and you need to familiarize yourself with the correct answers. Generally memorize the protocols. I’m going to regurgitate what I have internalized & point you to online resources to educate yourself further.

    Preparations made well in advance really give an advantage to survival.

    As soon as a nuke is dropped, go the fuck home. Turn on your faucets & fill all sinks & bathtubs, as this may be the last of your easy, clean, potable water you’ll get from the grid for who knows how long.

    One of the biggest & best things you can do is shelter in place, I think for a week. Radioactive fallout & the heavy alpha particles will be everywhere, and blow everywhere. Cover all windows & doors with Visqueen sheeting & duct tape, control & eliminate the travel of random-ass particulates. After 1 week, the radioactive potency of the dust particles should be reduced by 85-90%. That’s huge. So shut your windows & doors, seal everything up, and sit your ass down. It could save your life.

    Shelter in place requires food, water, preps. I think it’s overkill, but overkill is also kind of what you need/want, 1 gallon of water per person per day. When Russia started getting on their shit, people were buying up iodine tabs. This harmless substance negates the harmful effects of potential radioactive exposure via your food & drink. The trick is you have to take this stuff a set amount of time…before…exposure to radioactive particles. It protects your thyroid gland, IIRC. Have water, have food, maybe have a container or two of those fancy tablets.

    Especially in the earlier days, you help others by being able to help yourself. If there are assistance efforts, you can turn them down & the help can go to others in more dire need.

    We can, and do, talk about prepping things for years on end. I would recommend you tune in to Canadian Prepper (hey,I watched some of the video after & I didn’t do too badly!)

    Yes, Canadian Prepper touches on this. In my words: information is good. But the authorities, and other people, may lie or not tell the entire truth. They tell you what they want you to know. Good advice in general.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      But the authorities, and other people, may lie or not tell the entire truth. They tell you what they want you to know.

      You’d think that lesson would still be fresh from the pandemic, when at the very beginning the CDC tried to get the public not to hoard masks so the actual medical professionals could have them, then that got twisted and metastisized into “masks don’t work” and the ant-masker/anti-vaxxer bullshit.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The frustrating thing is that masks don’t protect you particularly well. What they do is protect others from any infection you are carrying. This is why it was more important to provide them to those interacting with infected or vulnerable people. It limited the risk of spreading it further.

      • Nikls94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think the aspect of “hoarding” itself is the culprit here. Yes Karen, you can take 4 masks for you and your 3 kids. No karen, you don’t need 28 for every day of the week.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably a stupid question, but during that week, going outside to fire up my whole house generator would probably be a death sentence. Right? So I should just live without electricity for a week? That reality has me thinking that I need to get one of those generators that turns itself on when power goes out. It would be really convenient during the winter anyways, since we lose power a lot when it snows around here.

      • DeLacue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes going outside in the first week is a very bad idea. However not because the radiation outside will instantly drop you. Much of the radiation will be coming from radioactive dust, known as fallout that’ll be comprised of all kinds of isotopes. The isotopes that decay quickly release a lot of radiation over a short period and if you go outside you will come back covered in them. This will bring radiation into wherever you are using as your shelter. This would not just harm the person who went outside but everyone else sheltering with them. So do not go outside for any reason. You can make do without power for a while.

        On a related note; keep water and food covered. Skin is a surprisingly good defense against radiation but breathing in this dust or letting it get into the food you eat or the water you drink is very dangerous. After a week has passed you should for your own safety keep the time spent outside your shelter as low as possible. Short trips outside will become safer as time goes on but activities that kick up dust will still be dangerous for a long time.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just get some kind of remote control for starting it. That way you still decide when it does and doesn’t run

  • memfree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    My understanding is the thing you most need is community. No one is likely to make it on their own, but if you can band together, your chances increase.

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you survive (big if) find Steve Huffman, he thinks he’ll be a good leader in a post apocalyptic earth

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone is talking about radiation but IMO having food and water is more important.

    In a large city, things would turn to shit within hours. There would be violence.

    Honestly, if you don’t have a relative on a farm within a days walk, then your best bet is a refugee camp.

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably just get away from the city or away from the radiation, forget about helping recovery effort as initial response. That can happen once your safe.

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The first rule is don’t become another casualty.

    Hunker down for a few days, iirc the most dangerous radiation will decay in the first few days. You don’t want the ash on your body. Fill your bathtub/whatever else with water to drink and ration your food.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Assuming your home isn’t on fire. Seal everything, do not go outside! If possible, stay inside for as long as possible. Fill everything with water your bathtub, every cup, bucket, etc. Monitor the radio for emergency broadcasts for what to do next. AM stations are more likely to work. If you have a CB radio handy, (depending on your country) you can talk to authorities on Channel 9.

    • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is also amateur radio (aka ham radio), which can legally and practically operate at higher output powers if necessary, and on far more frequencies than CB. Although doomsday people often say to just buy a ham radio and use it without a license, I don’t advise that, simply because having the radio is only half the challenge.

      The other half is the ability to competently operate the radio to effectively communicate and organize aid. And this only comes with practice, in the form of regular participation in radio nets and emcomm activities. Emergency radio isn’t even limited to voice transmissions, with digital modes and even fax modes being an option that can transmit quicker and farther.

      While some people will make ham radio a lifelong hobby, others obtain their license simply for small-talk, or for a SHTF scenario, or as longer-distance walkie-talkies when camping in heavily wooded forests. The possibilities are endless, but it all starts with a first radio and some basic training on radio handling.

      Ham radio clubs across the USA and the world are generally very welcoming of new folks, so it’s worth looking up your nearby club or drop in on an in-person club meeting.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The CB radio thing is going to be very location specific, I work in 911 dispatch, I think the state police around me theoretically monitor channel 9 on the highways, but in practice I wouldn’t have a lot of confidence in that, they barely look at info we send them over the computer, CB also has a somewhat limited range, so you’re counting on them having an officer somewhat nearby or you being close to their station.

      As for local police, around me I suspect a few of them probably still have a CB antenna on the roof of their station and maybe even an old radio stashed somewhere in a closet but not hooked up and not being monitored, and the officers definitely don’t have them in their vehicles.

      I’m in a pretty dense suburban area outside of a major city, they might still get some use in more rural areas where cell signals aren’t as reliable, though you’re probably going to run into the same issues with range limitations, in normal ideal conditions, you might get a range of about 20 miles or so, depending on atmospheric conditions, geography, etc. you might get only a fraction of that.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Generally, the worst intensity stuff is actually over in the first 48-72 hours depending upon various factors. That’s not to say outside is completely safe after that (it wouldn’t be), but the level of danger is very different.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tip regarding radio: 2182kHz near the coast. Those frequency is monitored by authorities globally. It’s the MF equivalent of maritime VHF ch16.

      Source: I have a GOC

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        CB radio has really short range and there’s little likelihood that authorities would be monitoring it.

        2182 kHz is long range marine radio and only good if you’re on a boat. I don’t know that anyone you talk to would care about a person on land while they’re handling their own maritime emergencies.

        If someone really wants emergency radio I’d suggest ham radio or GMRS.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Make sure my PC is ok and all GOG games downloaded. If needed, transfer the battlestation to a safer or better location, with a generator/solar panels & a decent battery.

    Profit.
    My life won’t change, I just won’t go to work.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If a blast happens in your city and you live…it’s probably best to just suicide rather then deal with the literal fallout and radiation poisoning.

    In Short, you will not survive…go painless

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      That was my first thought too, but i don’t know enough about blast radius to make a good decision. Are we talking 50 miles, 500 miles, …? Will it knock out a city, a state, or the country?

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Depends on the yield of the bomb but if we use the current yield of chinese ICBMs and detonated it above NYC much of Long Island would be just erased and the rest would be leveled. Manhattan would probably just be a flat smoking wasteland.

        https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          On your map most of Long Island is unaffected. It’s 12km moderate blast damage (5 psi) from the Chinese nuke. Long Island goes way off to the east. It’s 190km long.

          Tsar bomba is a different story though.

          • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            There will be many warheads targeting the NYC area since it’s an economic hub. Most everything on that map will either be glass or on fire.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That map doesn’t look like it touch on the fallout at all, just the damage from the explosion.

            Depending on how efficient the bomb is, and the direction of the winds, highly radioactive unspent fissile material will travel for miles. This stuff will shave decades off your life.

            • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I checked the website out yesterday. You can either have the fallout shown or not. It also depends on whether you choose to detonate in the air or on the surface. But if you choose the option with the fallout, boy,… honestly maybe don’t because it was legit more depressing and scary than what you see in the screenshot above.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                This is one of the fascinating things I learned about all the nuclear testing the USA was doing in the 70s 80s and 90s. They weren’t trying to make bigger bombs (that was 50s and 60s) it was making the same nuclear material in the bomb more completely used. The more of the material use, the less fallout.

                For reference, the Hiroshima bomb used less than 2% of its fuel. Of its 64kg of uranium, only about 1kg actually split. The rest of the highly radioactive Uranium was just spread around by the explosion as fallout.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      …unless the brain doesn’t die as fast as we believe, and so you become ‘paralyzed’ in a sense, beyond revival but still very aware of your predicament for some time. They do call it ‘practicing’ medicine, and nobody has been able to un-die and tell us what the actual process is.

      Imagine it being like sleep paralysis, until you decompose. Decaying in a buried box is the ‘good’ way.

      Things to think about.

  • Otherbarry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Say there is a nuclear explosion in the downtown of my US city.

    If it’s that close you then essentially you’ll need to decide whether to die quick or slow :/

    If you’re actually planning on surviving you’d need to stay in an underground bunker or something similar for at least 3-5 weeks to be safe enough to travel outside (and we’re assuming you have clean sources of food/water, bathroom, etc, during that time). If you make it that far then afterwards you’d likely want to go outside & get as far away from the radiation zone as possible.

    Coincidentally the basement of my work building actually has a fallout shelter sign from back in the day so the basement might survive a blast but I don’t see how I’d make it 3-5 weeks without being extra prepared for that beforehand.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It really depends.

      Scale of bomb

      Design of bomb.

      Distance from epicenter

      Ground explosion or atmospheric

      Prevailing winds

      City construction

      Etc, etc.

      It’s nowhere near as simple as we’ve been taught.

      I’ve looked at the bomb simulator linked above, and for me and my city, and where I live, prevailing winds, etc, only the two largest warheads would have direct effect on me, and fallout isn’t a concern for the rest (distance and prevailing winds).

      Now after that, it would surely be a complete shit show. I’d likely have no water (or maybe I would, this suburb isnt tied to the city). Power would certainly be an issue, as would telephone/cell, radio would be problematic for a short while. Food would be a problem, of course.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m far from an expert on this, but I would guess the safety of being outdoors heavily depends on additional factors, like for example wind direction and speed.

  • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    No time like the present to get involved with something like a Community Emergency Response Team or its local equivalent. FEMA has manuals and other training materials available online which address the matter of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNE; sometimes just CBRN or NBC depending on agency or publication date) incidents. Won’t make you an expert on yield estimation or fallout mapping but there is information which may be useful for improving individual and community resilience.

    Personally, I think the likelihood of getting nuked is low and it’s much more likely that a CERT volunteer will be called upon to assist in natural disasters or major accidents to relieve the burden on professional crews. Where I live, teams have been employed to assist in redirecting traffic around areas with downed power lines or, in one case somewhat recently, a significant natural gas leak. Firefighters and other specialists establish a safe perimeter before handing off the site to volunteers so they can respond to other incidents throughout the city while repair crews work down their list of priorities.

    Long comment short: building useful skills and relationships before shit meets fan means less scrambling to figure it out on that day and there are real, practical applications for that knowledge beyond LARPing with Jim-Bob’s moron militia.