• Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Real question. If the vice presidential duty is to ceremoniously sign off on delegate votes, how will that work if Kamala is the VP, but also on the ticket? I could see these MAGA nuts using that to drum up support for a stolen election, they tried it when Pence was VP, and he wasn’t an electee.

      • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would argue they were just better at hiding the same type of shit these modern politicians are thinking and saying. Now it’s just acceptable. Then you had Howard Dean dooming himself for a cowboy scream.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Putting an e on the end of potato basically ended his political career and now Trump supporters shout “covfefe” because they think it’s somehow smart. I think about that a lot.

        Or the fact that people largely see the photo that Dukakis took in a tank as the moment HW Bush won the 88 election - compared to Trump’s photo op in a Fire Truck…

        • nickiwest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Or when Howard Dean “ruined” his political career by whooping at a rally because it “wasn’t presidential.”

          Our expectations are so low right now that putting together two cogent sentences could literally mean that you win the election.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The 90s: “How could we ever put someone in charge who’s so stupid he can’t even spell potato?”

        George W. Bush: “Watch this drive”

        Donald J. Trump: “unintelligible gibberish”

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Simpler times. He gave us these nuggets of wisdom:

      • “You take the UNCF model that what a waste it is to lose one’s mind or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is”
      • “The Holocaust was an obscene period in our nation’s history. … No, not our nation’s, but in World War II. I mean, we all lived in this century. I didn’t live in this century, but in this century’s history”
      • “I have made good judgments in the past. I have made good judgments in the future”
      • “I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change”
      • “potatoe” (when trying to “correct” a 12-yr old’s spelling of “potato”)
    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Worst is subjective. I’d argue that Cheney’s support of blood for oil and Halliburton rebuild scheme was far worse than anything Quayle did.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Agreed. Despite Vance’s inability to please a crowd, he’s more on the “Cheney dangerous” side of the spectrum than “Quayle dumb.”

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Everyone loves a redemption arc. But how sad is it that the ‘potatoe’ guy was the voice of reason who helped save American democracy in it’s darkest hour (so far!). We really are living through Idiocracy!

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Let’s be real, JD Vance was picked by the party to be the adult in the room who can actually get Project 2025 passed under Trump since Trump doesn’t care about Project 2025 and just wants what’s best for himself at that moment and to be a petty little bitch

    Also worth noting that Vance has no personality. When asked in Eau Claire, WI “why should a voter want to have a beer with you” he responded “uh I uh haha um I actually like beer haha” (he also tried to sidestep a question about Tim Walz by saying “we aren’t talking about Minneapolis policy, were talking about Wisconsin” while literally standing 1 hour’s drive from Minneapolis

    And when asked “what makes you smile” instead of any sane answer he answered “insane questions from biased reporters like you!” Then followed it with waffling about how he loves his job so much while forcing the fakest smile you’ve ever seen

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      IMHO they want Vance for one reason: Trump thinks he can control him, but Vance’s actual master, Theil, will have Vance 25th amendment the orange asshat on day one - giving Theil the whitehouse.

      • rodneylives@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Vice President can’t do that without “a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide” on their side. That can’t happen without either the aid of people that Trump would have to select (and he’s notorious for picking toadies) or Congress passing a bill to create a body to evict him.

    • ThatOneKrazyKaptain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also the Ohio thing makes sense when you look at the Senate map. There are exactly two remotely competitive races, Montana and Ohio. Ohio is leaning blue and Montana is leaning red. Picking JD boosts Ohio and Trump is campaigning in Montana right now. Those choices were both made when Biden was still in so seemingly the idea was to secure the Senate and grab an extra seat or two so it’s not razor tight and vulnerable to RINOs.

    • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fuck that’s such an easy layup of a question too. You just respond, “because I’m buying”. No positions to attack, potentially makes you look human, and maybe costs you a beer.

  • rodneylives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doom is overstating things, especially with the fucking electoral college in the US and election shenanigans afoot in Georgia. Don’t lose focus!

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Won’t anyone comfort j.d. vance through this difficult time? Anyone? Any…thing?

  • Upsidedownturtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, he’s an election denying Maga billionaires’ toady, that lacks any charisma, trashes where he came from and then hitches himself to someone he previously denounced in an effort to gain political power. Oh and he wants to completely ban abortion. He’s an unlikable political opportunist. It’s no wonder that the publics opinion of him will continue to drop.

    • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The thing about this meme is that it’s stuck so it works. Doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. You can just call him a couch fucker and it renders anything he says irrelevant.

      If you meet anyone who wants to talk about voting for the guy you just need to call them a couch fucker too and you’re done.

  • Kushan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But confusingly, Trump has continued to send Vance out to campaign events all week, while the Republican presidential nominee has remained largely out of the public eye. Given Vance’s low appeal, it’s unclear how this strategy helps the campaign.

    Trump is going to blame Vance for the failure of his campaign, calling it now. He’ll have the usual shit about dems as well, but he’s going to scapegoat vance and throw him under the bus just like he’s done with literally everyone else before him.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      After trying to have his last Veep hung, I’m not really sure why anybody would think it would go any different for them. I guess he found another thoroughbred narcissist to join him this time. “It couldn’t possibly happen to me.”

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The thing that almost got Pence killed was having a tiny shred of respect for his responsibilities. That’s not a problem for someone who’s completely self-serving or all in for Trump.

    • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t quite understand this reasoning, though, since he would never acknowledge losing anyway and his freedom may rely on winning this election.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That didn’t happen. And if it did, it wasn’t that bad. And if it was, that’s not a big deal. And if it is, that’s not my fault. <----- And if it was, I didn’t mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.

        That’s why. He’ll jump to number six after he loses, saying the GOP didn’t support him enough and they deserved to lose.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        his freedom may rely on winning this election

        If he were ever in danger of actual imprisonment, he could always move to Russia or Saudi Arabia.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        With the Supreme Court and Judge Cannon in his pocket, he will never see the inside of a prison cell.

    • Laborer3652@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      But Trumps only reason for president is to dismiss the federal charges against him. Intentionally losing the race doesn’t help that goal.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        If they get to a point where they know they cannot win the race, they will shift tactics and it will no longer be about the election, but about the peaceful transfer of power in January. Biden himself came out and said it yesterday, I think there is a real, genuine concern of Trump and his base “flipping the board” so to speak.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        But Trumps only reason for president is to dismiss the federal charges against him.

        That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Trump wants another stab at the Prez because he wants to settle scores. This wouldn’t just be an attempt at a self-pardon. He fully intended to unleash his DOJ and law enforcement on the political opposition.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Trump has had more ramblings and incoherent moments than ever before recently. I think his team is hiding him so he can recover somehow because his dementia is just unraveling

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Donald is sending this hated guy around to campaign solely because Donald is a low-energy geriatric suffering from dementia. He is far too old to be president.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wish people actually believed this, rather than just tossing it out as a barb. Wouldn’t mind seeing a statutory requirement for Presidents to be under the age of 75. But it would never see the light of day in our gerontocracy.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “People” meaning voters? Because I’m pretty sure the people tossing the barb believe it. I certainly do. It’s not the worst thing about Trump by far, but it’s a problem nonetheless.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Because I’m pretty sure the people tossing the barb believe it.

          “Age doesn’t matter because Trump is worse” was the refrain on this sub for months.

          It’s not the worst thing about Trump by far

          That’s the problem with any kind of generic critique. If you’re always carving out an exception because it’s a two party system where one party always sucks, then “He’s too old” has no substance. You’re going to vote for whatever the only acceptable party feeds you, whether its a spry young cop-loving prosecutor from California or an 80 year old Senatorial mummy from Delaware.

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Age isn’t relevant when you’re choosing between two people who are the same age. That’s no longer the case, so age is now a distinguishing factor.

            Anyway, my gripe with the age talk wasn’t that age doesn’t matter; it was that Biden was being hammered on it as if Trump is somehow better in that regard.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Age isn’t relevant when you’re choosing between two people who are the same age.

              Are you suggesting that you’d support a Trump campaign if he’d been 20 years younger?

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Hell no, and I already said it’s not the most important factor. But in a sane world where both candidates are decent people, age could very well be a deciding factor for me.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  But in a sane world where both candidates are decent people

                  The partisan divide is predicated on assuming your rivals aren’t good people. That’s why everyone loves calling each other Tankies and Communists/Fascists and foreign shills.

            • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Anyway, my gripe with the age talk wasn’t that age doesn’t matter; it was that Biden was being hammered on it as if Trump is somehow better in that regard.

              Pretty much this. People kept harping about Biden’s issues with speaking due to his age while somehow completely ignoring that Trump makes no sense in his blathering rambling at any point and hasn’t made any sense in years, but I wonder how much of that was manufactured by MAGA hats because age is literally the only sane argument they had against Biden. Reading transcripts of Trump’s bull shit was mind-numbing and he’s pushing 80 too.

        • DerArzt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          How about we tie the ability to serve in the government to being below retirement age period?

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think we should tie it to life expectancy. “No person may be a candidate for office if their age at the end of their term would exceed 90% of the median US life expectancy.”

            It would keep politicians younger and motivate them to make policies that improve life expectancy. Win-win.

          • overcast5348@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Do you want them to raise the age of retirement? Because they’ll make you work till you’re a thousand before they all quit en masse.

  • kikutwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Go figure, people don’t want zealots chiming in about why they are or why they are not having children?

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t believe polls, they don’t mean anything. Go out and vote. It’s not over till it’s over. Otherwise we risk things going tits up again.

    • vegetal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think knowing that I will be undermining JD Vance (and Trump, of course) will be a gigantic motivator for me.

    • Wiz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, the good guys need to win overwhelmingly to overcome the bad guys cheating.

      It’s not fair, but that’s the system we have right now.