• madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maga really doesn’t like freedom of speech, does it?

    No one is owed you any advertisement on your platform. Bunch of snowflakes.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What is it woth the right and cancel culture? It feels like there’s no free speech anymore.

    Bunch of snowflakes.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Whatever blip Bud Light experienced was due to their flip flopping. I was ready to start stocking up for our annual July 04 bash and would have gone out of my way to buy some (even though I don’t normally) until they rolled over for the magas and fired the person responsible for sending that single can of bud light to a trans influencer. I know others had a similar thought process, because I’ve seen it discussed online and in meatspace.

    I’m sure I’ve bought products that they own since then unknowingly, but haven’t knowingly bought an AB product since then. All they had to do was take a stance, but they proved to be exactly what all megacorps are - greedy and spineless. Edit: Just like Target, I might add.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Bud Light one was actually impactful for several months:

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bud_Light_boycott

      “On June 3, Brayden King, a professor of management and organizations, gave an interview to CNBC calling the Bud Light boycott an outlier in the right’s attack on “woke capitalism” because it is the first one to actually harm the company’s sales. King studied 133 political boycotts from 1990 to 2005 and none of them accounted for more than a 1% drop in sales for a company; the Bud Light boycott had resulted in an estimated 18% drop in all AB InBev sales.”

      • ForensicFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bunch of rednecks and angry fundies boycott a higher cost department store/coffee shop… meh. The same people boycott $2/gal alcoholic piss water? Real shit

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The thing is Budweiser caved pretty much immediately, which also led to allies boycotting! Dumbasses did the worst possible thing, fold to a decentralized demand and piss off everyone while not even ending the boycott from the first group because there was no one to tell them they won!

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Interesting. I had assumed it went like the other 133 that source mentions.

        Wonder if there’s just an extremely over-sized overlap between conservatives who were going to be offended about and willing to boycott and people who drink cheap beer that led to that statistically unusual outcome.

        Also maybe cheap beer is cheap beer and there’s limited enough brand loyalty that other types of products don’t?

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It was the fact that Bud Light openly advertised using a trans person. It was an image that could be flaunted and would rally even moderate republicans.

          An executive respectfully writing a response detailing why they would not want their brand associated with a platform that had extreme right wing views is much harder to rally around…

          Fundamentally it’s because there is no convenient image to rally behind… they would have to read and think to be outraged.

          • Vanon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            When they figure out how to use AI to generate picture book propaganda for their followers, watch out. (Wait, is that why they are obsessed with meme images…)

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Kind of…

              “Although AB InBev did have to sell the U.S. distribution rights to Modelo to rival Constellation Brands as the result of an anti-trust suit in 2013, one could still make the argument that Anheuser-Busch still technically retains its top ranking since it still owns the Modelo brand.”

              They just don’t have US distribution.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think there was any real strong attachment to it. It was a recognizable go-to cheap beer. But nowadays there’s dozens of cheap light beers, and seltzers, and mixed drinks in a can, and ciders, and I can go on.

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rumble/Locals is a video sharing platform, like YouTube, and you don’t have any of the ridiculous no-no words & censorship of YouTube to abide by (under threat of age-gating, deletion, demonetization). You can say words like: suicide, depression, covid, vaccine, Hitler, porn, pedophile, etc etc etc without people getting all weird.

      You can stream copyrighted content & watch a movie together, as long as there’s some banter & you’re not straight ripping movies. It’s fun, it’s like watching with friends.

      Each creator can enforce THEIR OWN censorship & values on their community as they see fit, the only thing(s) Rumble/Locals does not want to see are: porn, child porn, and idk probably like extreme gore.

  • razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m confused about this lawsuit. Haven’t advertisers always been allowed to not advertise in places they don’t think align with their brand?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What is this weird as fuck idea these people have that they’re entitled to a company’s advertising money?