Concluding that Russia interfered with an election to Trump’s benefit isn’t the same thing as concluding that Trump conspired with the Russians
Even if the report had concluded they conspired, concluding they conspired isn’t the same thing as having “sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges”
But, the report said, “because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct.
And
the investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russia offers of assistance to the Campaign.
But, the report said, “because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct.
i presume you’re pulling that from volume 2 of the report, since you didn’t link anything
volume 1 deals with election interference
volume 2 deals with obstruction of justice
or in other words, your quote isn’t relevant to evidence for conspiracy with russia
the investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russia offers of assistance to the Campaign.
“establishing multiple links” isn’t the same thing as concluding they conspired, but even if it was, the second line of my initial comment addresses this:
Even if the report had concluded they conspired, concluding they conspired isn’t the same thing as having “sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges”
Concluding that Russia interfered with an election to Trump’s benefit isn’t the same thing as concluding that Trump conspired with the Russians
Even if the report had concluded they conspired, concluding they conspired isn’t the same thing as having “sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges”
Mueller very specifically refused to conclude that there wasn’t sufficient evidence to charge Donny.
from here
maybe he did but that’s the only definitive statement i can find from him on the matter
Mueller was talking about obstruction. It’s hard to prove conspiracy if your witnesses are allowed to obstruct.
And
i presume you’re pulling that from volume 2 of the report, since you didn’t link anything
volume 1 deals with election interference
volume 2 deals with obstruction of justice
or in other words, your quote isn’t relevant to evidence for conspiracy with russia
“establishing multiple links” isn’t the same thing as concluding they conspired, but even if it was, the second line of my initial comment addresses this:
Speaking of, where the hell is our fucking Unredacted report??
the memory hole