“I have spent my career inviting diversity of opinion. I think it’s important to have people at the table when some of the most important decisions are being made that have different views, different experiences,” Harris said. “And I think it would be to the benefit of the American public to have a member of my Cabinet who was a Republican.”

  • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    OK I hear you but

    Because [not fair, tit for tat]

    Sounds like an insufficient reason to pass up a tactical advantage. That would be “cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face,” wouldn’t it?

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Hey it’s politics - tactical advantage wins over integrity every time, I get it. I can still be pissed off though, right? She’s getting my vote, do I AT LEAST get to be angry about it without being told to shush?

      (Not by you specifically.)

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        For sure, it doesn’t feel just to offer olive branches to folks who haven’t earned it. I don’t know if I’d be emotionally mature enough to do it, but I’m glad to have a candidate who can keep a cool head and do what it takes to win.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      This assumes that announcing you’ll give Republicans power is a tactical advantage. That’s the whole core of the false dichotomy.