• David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They apparently copied without attribution in a manner that was a violation? I’m still looking for precise wording of the PEL.

    It’s very hard to violate the Apache license, but these are the sort of bozos who could manage it.

    EDIT: Here is the PEL. It lacks the attribution requirements of section 4 of the Apache Licence 2.0. So yeah, they managed it.

    This is a small technical violation that’s easily remedied, but I understand that’s what got people pissed off.