• celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Plastic surgery/facelifts/botox, hair dye, makeup, and favorable lighting can make all the difference. You’ll eventually look like an inhuman ghoul, but you’ll be the sexiest 60 year old for a short while.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    From what I’ve heard bread Pitt is bald. I mean if they didn’t have the Hollywood money, guys like Pitt would look like the rest of us

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s selection bias… They are some of the best looking famous people in the world, no surprise they remain some of the best.

  • frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, one of them is an abusive drunk, one is a cult member who has multiple ex-wives who’ve basically fled the marriage, and one is Tim Walz. Think I’d pick Walz.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      My main takeaway is cults and alcohol abuse makes you look young.

      But having a loving fulfilling life makes you oh so fuckable. 🤤

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    60, 60, 62

    If you’re lucky enough to have all your original hair and teeth at 60, and don’t let yourself go to shit, this is easily doable. Here’s me (53) at a costume party last weekend.

    Lemmy: “No one can do this without money!!!”

    Uh, no. A little luck and a lot of self-care is more like it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Here’s me (53) at a costume party last weekend.

      You were not bad in Lost and Succession but you really should be ashamed of yourself for the Short Circuit movies.

    • troglodytis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re doing great. Keep up the good work, but 53 is not 60, or 62. There is definitely a magnitude difference there.

      I do my fair share of swiping right and left. I am and enjoy the older crowd, so my filters reflect that. The difference is usually easily observable

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      You look how I expect 53 to look, well maintained not young. People are aging more slowly for sure. I look at pictures of my mom at my age and we don’t look the same age.

      But if you don’t have money (for gym or weights, Retin-A, good sunscreen, a job that doesn’t stress the fuck out of you) it really is more difficult. Stress is so aging, rich or not, but less stress is easier with money.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Superstar actors are more attractive than the general population? Next your going to tell me that a professional athletes of his age are in better shape.

    • GoosLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Actually, I’m pretty sure professional athletes of his age would be in worse shape. Professional athletes tend to give their bodies a pretty brutal beating for years in the sprint towards pushing themselves to the absolute extreme limits of what the human body can do. This is also not healthy or natural, just on the other end of the scale from a sedentary lifestyle.

      I mean, I got your point, I just felt like it was worth pointing out that athletes aren’t necessarily symbols of health, especially not in the later stages of life.