• PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    While your proposition is still better than the neoliberal merry-go-round, unions can only serve as a base for vanguard worker’s party. Unions by themselves never once seized the means of production and ultimately most of them turned into tools of class collaboration.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What’s wrong with Marxism? Why do you advocate for Syndicalism, does it just sound good to you, or is there a materialist reason for it?

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          First off, nobody takes Marxism by itself. If it’s accepted, it’s always with extra things attached and other parts removed.

          Second, my issue in this case is the Lennist part. A vanguard party degrades into cult-like behavior, and this is very consistent with ML groups big and small.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            First off, nobody takes Marxism by itself. If it’s accepted, it’s always with extra things attached and other parts removed.

            What on Earth do you mean? What do people remove?

            Second, my issue in this case is the Lennist part. A vanguard party degrades into cult-like behavior, and this is very consistent with ML groups big and small.

            What do you mean “cult-like behavior?” Why do you believe this “cult-like behavior” arises? Where does Lenin deviate from Marx?

            Why do you advocate for Syndicalism, because it sounds good to you? You aren’t making any analysis nor points, you just seem to be contrarion. Surely you have some reason for wanting syndicalism, no?