Kinda sad you’ve gone with the whole “nuh-uh!” Name-calling thing, but that’s no argument.

Water isn’t wet, it just makes other things wet. Try not to get upset about that.

Nope, and name-calling is just another ad-hominem fallacy

You have the mistaken belief that because water makes other things that touches wet that it must be wet itself. That simply isn’t the case.

I’m sorry that is so difficult for you to accept.

a towel is not water. dryness is not wetness.

you’re using the association fallacy and the false equivalence fallacies again, which is how you’re wrong.

it cant make other liquids wet because its already wet by nature

incorrect. this is the association fallacy-- you cannot prove it is wet other than through fallacy. wetness is only a property it can give to other things, not a property it possesses itself. water can’t be wet simply because it makes something else wet.

therefore, you are wrong.

no matter how many times you tell me im wrong, i’ll always know you are wrong

and, for that, you’ll always be wrong.

Nope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids.

Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.

Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.

Again, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.

Hence the fallacies.

Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.

And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy.

Fire is not a liquid.

Not at all

Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.

When water touches water you get more water, not wet water

That’s the point

You must not have watched the same presidential debate I did.

For instance, I dance a lot. I have even started ballet dancing. And in the past I had an eating disorder. Now I know this may sound a kind of bigoted or stereotypical. But I don’t mean it that way, this is purely based on statistics.

these things do make not a person LGBTQ+

However I feel in no way that I am in the wrong body. I like being a man, I like the idea of masculinity

this seems to be pretty much the qualifying criterion, and, to this, I’d ay no, you’re (very probably) not trans.

But it makes me “worried” if I do end up tran

people are born LGBTQ+ and typically know it all their lives. From you descriptions, it seems like you might just be Bi. Enjoying “non-masculine” activities doesn’t really mean anything in and of itself. Being LGBTQ+ isn’t something one “ends up as”-- it’s something we always have been.

when I already have a wife and children

and so what? sure, there may be some adjustments for them to make, but, unless they’re transphobes, it shouldn’t be a problem.

Lol

isn’t posting 4chan content kinda cheating here? lol

you mean when he kept responding to Trump’s tirade of lies? THAT was all over the place, so it makes sense that Biden would have to cover a lot of ground.

oh, no disagreement here-- but it’s either Biden or Cheeto Mussolini.

i’m glad you’re not choosing that latter!

he may hove spoken more clearly, but - by no means - is he a better speaker. he spent the entire debate incoherently spewing his unhinged conspiracy theories and lie after lie.