• 1 Post
  • 430 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Hey, I’ve edited the tone of the targeted communication. Does this fit your guidelines?

    I understand you have power over both communities and have personal beef, but would it be fair for me to ask a different moderator to input here?

    Can you remove yourself due to a conflict of interest?

    Can you make a post of the overall discourse that mods can be directed to instead of hashing it out in my thread? My post here is being derailed by personal attacks and you are choosing to kick me out.

    This is kind of my entire point about singled out harrasment by stalker mods.

    Thanks, you also have a good one.


  • For those who want to know what this admin is referencing:

    I made a post in the movies sub this morning. I was notifying star wars fans there was a theatrical re-run of Episode 1 on May 4th so they should grab their tickets now.

    A group of shitposters came in being assholes ranging from saying Star wars is bad to personal attacks that people who like star wars are insufferable.

    People who make their whole personality about Star Wars, or Star Trek, or Marvel Comics, or whatever…

    Are just as bad as potheads who make their whole personality revolve around the fact that they smoke pot.

    Direct quote of one of the commenters

    I simply said

    “Sorry yall were born with bad taste. Hope it gets better”.

    And the mod specifically singled me out as they followed me from this thread.

    The other comment is still up.



  • I only started mass downvoting super mod activity as of today in response to yet another moderator interaction. Don’t try to frame the way I interacted on this site before this post with my reaction to moderator harrasment since then.

    Yall can keep your modlog to yourself, and your personal attacks.

    Yall are literally stalking me across different posts to start shit and now trying to dig up additional personal information to frame this profile. You call defending myself from yalls harrasment “combatative”.

    The only power a user has to combat yalls harrasment is the downvote button or posting and opening themselves up to further harrasment. A downvote is a legitimate form of interaction and is exactly how I plan on interacting with every super mod post going forward.

    This all happened after this post, not before it, and I’ve had dozens of perfectly fine interactions with dozens of users on this site outside of the mods.

    Enjoy choking this site to death with your stalking.

    And I’ve barely used this site, but the metrics are showing it going down. The mods are literally in another thread, crying to each other about “shouting to the void”. So maybe you are coping by pinning the death of your subs on one user who is sick of yall.

    Well now you know why you are losing users.

    Yall start shit with legitimate interaction in the name of civility to protect rancid shitposting.


  • None of my statements were attacking anything except for racist ideology.

    It seems to me that amzd compared speciesism to racism, specifically to condemn speciesism, and by extention factory farms. Not to condone racism.

    The step you need, to go from “racism is wrong” to “speciesism is wrong” is to extend your circle of compassion to all sentient animals and not just humans.

    This is a direct quote from them that this is based on.

    ++++++++++

    Here is your comment I responded to. The claim you were challenging was me saying I was not uncivil because I attacked racist ideology, not individuals.

    ++++++++++

    Looking at the modlog, you weren’t banned for your views but your combative and rude attitude expressed in numerous comments, breaking the rules about civility.

    ++++++++++

    Here is the start of this specific comment chain that you are debating my response to.

    But now that I’ve hammered down to the point of the matter, you want to posture that I’ve lost the comment chain.






  • nac82@lemm.eetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldProve Im wrong
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    We couldn’t use photos of OP for this joke. They all just looked like thumbs with sunglasses, lol.

    It’s incredible how afraid the shallow people of the world are. One celebrity openly transitions, and yall can never have a functional thought again without your hate.




  • I’m not here to debate the validity of cherry-picked portions of their statement. Feel free to respond to me in that thread on that topic. Then you might understand my rant about pointless bans here. I was fully willing to engage in a good faith debate on this topic in the place where it was happening.

    I’m here venting and now justifying my vent to you. You were claiming I was uncivil, and I’m asking you to point at my uncivil statements.

    As a sign of good faith, I’ll point out that the debate on veganism wasn’t being fairly input to the thread. The reason I gave half assed responses was that they were attacking people unjustly to begin with.

    Veganism is a complex topic ranging from food scarcity to eating habits. I’m an advocate for veganism and participate in 3 vegan days a week. Both me and my wife come from heavy meat cultures and do not find it so simple a habit to beat.

    But even when I pointed out they didn’t know my stance on veganism, they were still assholes at a personal level.

    So please go continue the conversation on veganism with the rest of the circlejerk where I am banned.

    I would prefer the focus of this post be about how unrelated moderation is stifling this site to death.


  • Yup, this was it. I would appreciate if you included the snarky initial vegan response to the initial comment that triggered that chain, too. It would be more relevant than those other 2 comments of the random chain above.

    Just saying if we are doing context, full context is best. Blaze already included a link, so it’s not necessary, but this is the visual in this thread, thus is the most immediate attention grabbing version of it.



  • Rude attitude is worthy of a ban? Why are none of the rude shit talking vegans in that thread banned? And the other dude has a screenshot of my statements. What are you saying was rulebreaking civility rules?

    None of my statements were attacking anything except for racist ideology.

    I have no problem admitting I was being rude, the initial topic was about people enraged by the slaughter of a dolphin, and some vegans decided that was the time to shit talk people’s diets in response. I was rude to people being rude.

    But I never broke civility rules and was never more egregious than the vegans I was responding to.

    Seems kinda like exactly my point that being rude to rude vegans being enough reason to perma ban somebody from a news sub on this site, and how that will choke this site to death.