Masterwork, a photo of Little Red Riding Hood, young, ((sexy)), small breasts, pale skin, (realistic face, perfect eyes, perfect face:1.1), standing in a dark forest with a wolf ((hiding)) in the background, extremely high quality RAW photograph, detailed background, intricate, Exquisite details and textures, highly detailed, ultra detailed photograph, warm lighting, 4k, sharp focus, high resolution, film grain
Negative prompt: bad art, ugly face, messed up face, poorly drawn hands, bad hands, photoshop, doll, plastic_doll, silicone, anime, cartoon, fake, filter, airbrush, 3d max, infant, featureless, colourless, impassive, shaders, EasyNegative
Steps: 64, Sampler: DPM++ SDE Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1938658715, Face restoration: CodeFormer, Size: 900x900, Model hash: 6fae47d4e2, Model: lazymixRealAmateur_v30a
This is just so wrong. English dictionaries are descriptive: they describe how the language is being used.
In 1961 people like you threw a fit that “ain’t” was added to Webster’s, despite its first known use over 200 years earlier.
English has no ultimate arbiter of “proper” use; it changes as people use it and dictionaries are a reference for how it is being used, not how it ought to be used.
Language is a living, changing thing. It doesn’t matter how many grammar nazis oppose the changes, if enough people start using a word or phrase in a different way, that becomes the “right” way to use the word/phrase. “Nice” used to mean foolish, “meat” once meant food in general, and in my lifetime “gay” went from “happy” to “homosexual”.
If you can’t accept that language changes, you’re gonna have a bad time.