• SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unless you consider the fact that the only reason they need milking is that they were forced into pregnancy in the first place.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah, it is. Actual industry practice - impregnate cow mechanically without consent, bring baby cow to term, kill majority of baby cows for veal after separation after a few days from birth, repeat after cows stops producing milk, until cow is used up (around 10 years IIRC, a fraction of their normal lifespan) and also killed for meat.

        • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is an example of behavior that pushes anyone who isn’t a militant vegan away. I even know vegans who have second thoughts about their decisions over attitudes like those represented in the comment above me.

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Neither do I. If I had my say, everyone would spend some time on a farm and kill their own food at least once.

              There is empathy, and there is misappropriation. Farmed animals have it better than wild animals.

              • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                In all fairness that heavily depends on the type of farming. I highly doubt mass farmed chickens have it better than their wild counterparts given they have about 2cm² of space available before they have to trample on another chicken.

                Free range farming however I absolutely agree is better for the animals than living in the wild. Imo given the various benefits (mostly the extremely reduced need for antibiotics, seriously we have to stop feeding them to animals: it’s biting us in the ass already) it offers over industrial scale farming we should move back to it.

                • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  In all fairness that heavily depends on the type of farming. I highly doubt mass farmed chickens have it better than their wild counterparts given they have about 2cm² of space available before they have to trample on another chicken.

                  I’ve seen a chicken who escaped a fox. It lived for DAYS. I’d take a battery cage over that. But I do take your point to heart.

                  Free range farming however I absolutely agree is better for the animals than living in the wild. Imo given the various benefits (mostly the extremely reduced need for antibiotics, seriously we have to stop feeding them to animals: it’s biting us in the ass already) it offers over industrial scale farming we should move back to it.

                  100%. My home state has free range laws and I fully support them. Our eggs went up about $1/dozen, not exactly a big deal. I would 100% support humane treatment regulations that nominally increase the price of meat products.

                  And I agree about feeding animals antibiotics. I understood why they did it in the first place, but now that we know it’s harmful it needs to stop.