• namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The inevitable fate of any useful software that’s not GPL.

      When will people learn???

      Edit: Ironically, KHTML was originally LGPL. So modifications to KHTML were required to be open source by the license, but Chrome itself isn’t required to be open source (at least as far as I understand it, I am not an expert here). Nevertheless, if it were stronger GPL, then it probably wouldn’t have been impossible to write features like DRM in chrome. So I would have been a bit of an idiot to say that KHTML isn’t GPL (because LGPL is a weaker version of GPL), but in effect, the outcome is the same - all because of that big fat L at the beginning.

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They didn’t do anything of the sort. We don’t need to endlessly recite the history of everything developed. If you want to call attention to it go right ahead but they didn’t give Apple a pass.

    • HollandJim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      …they didn’t try to own parts the web. But I suppose we can forget that part too.

      Edit: ah - I’m in /c/technology, where apple hate is real. Nevermind.

      • jackhp95@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        They totally do though. You can ONLY use webkit on any iOS device. Chrome, Firefox, etc. they all are forced to use webkit on iOS. Neither Google or Apple are treating the web nicely, but at least you have a choice to use a different browser. Apple makes that effectively impossible.

        • nixcamic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also you can’t really use Apple TV properly without an Apple device. Same with iCloud. Actually really any service they make only works properly with their full stack.

        • HollandJim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          While you disagree with it, I prefer Apple safeguarding browsing. Do I want real Chrome on my phone, the most personal device I use? No fucking way. Many of us buy into the Apple ecosystem for this reason, to further separate us from marketeers and trackers. To say Apple is the same as Google completely ignores this; IMHO, Google is far, far worse.

          Of course I’m in c/technology. Bring on the anti-Apple downvotes.

          • Bene7rddso@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I want Firefox (with its engine, not webkit) on my phone. With Apple that’s not possible

            • HollandJim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Then choose a different platform. Why do I need to sacrifice my security for your choice? Android has plenty of good software and hardware options and customization out the wahzoo.

              • jackhp95@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s easy to not have Firefox on your device, just don’t install it. Why should apple prevent you from being able to do that?