In a statement, Northvolt says its validated cell is more safe, cost-effective, and sustainable than conventional nickel, manganese and cobalt (NMC) or iron phosphate (LFP) chemistries and is produced with minerals such as iron and sodium that are abundant on global markets.

It is based on a hard carbon anode and a Prussian White-based cathode, and is free from lithium, nickel, cobalt and graphite. Leveraging a breakthrough in battery design and manufacturing, Northvolt plans to be the first to industrialize Prussian White-based batteries and bring them to commercial markets.

Reports across the web also say the technology enables the supply chain to become ecologically more sustainable, cheaper, abd less dependent on China.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      This isn’t some technology being researched, it’s an actual product in development. I’d certainly take their numbers with a pinch of salt but the premise is solid.

    • IndefiniteBen@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      This isn’t some futuristic technology. Na-ion was originally researched at the same time as Li-ion but didn’t show enough commercial promise in the 1990s.

      Sodium-ion batteries have already been deployed in a few locations. The energy density is only 160 Wh/kg (compared to 100-220 for Li-ion) so you won’t see it in personal devices, but for applications where space isn’t at a premium, this technology is already in market.

      Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium-ion_battery

      • taladar@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I believe you mean mass, not space if you cite the energy density per kg.

        • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Technically correct (best kind) but in reality, to get the same capacity, you’ll need more mass, which uses more space as well.

          • taladar@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Well, it is a big difference when we are talking about applications like air or space travel where space might be a lot easier to increase than the capacity to carry extra mass.