• Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Voluntarily passing up an opportunity to lie, bloviate, ax-grind, spleen-vent and obfuscate before a national audience? To play (paper-thin) ‘tough guy’ before his degenerate maga-head cult crowd?

    Something’s really off here…

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 months ago

        He may lose a lot of his hotels and maybe even Maralago over this, he’s nervous and going to get even more crazy talking soon.

      • Dantpool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        If he loses the trial, he’ll blame the lawyer that didn’t want him to testify, and claim they were part of the deep state.

        It’s also extremely disheartening that I had to say, “If he loses” and that I have no faith in our justice system anymore.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          He already lost. Summary judgement at the outset. At this point, it’s just about how badly he lost. And Engoron does not appear to be a fan of his behavior.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah, he can do that outside on the courtroom steps without even risking perjury charges.

    • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Testifying is under oath, so bloviating like he does can result in actual consequences.

      That’s my guess, anyway.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          He’d constantly be on the phone to news max, Fox, and Oann. No need to bother with an incoherent book.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        As he already learned in other defamation cases, you don’t have to be under oath to say things that will cost you a lot of money. But when you’re under oath, the potential consequences are larger.