All the ingredients are there and it won’t take much to put it all together.

  • Bizarroland@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    All I’m going to say in regards to any kind of American civil war is this: Whoever fires the first shot loses.

    That’s the primary issue everyone is up against. They don’t want to be the ones to fire the first shot because that will justify the national guard being rolled out and a massive escalation.

    It’s not going to end well for the loser.

      • Entropywins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes… that is how you miss the forest for the trees… skipping interesting assertions and waxing philosophical on the definition of civil war

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      On Jan 6, armies of magats attacked the Capitol Building with the explicit goal of lynching the vice president and Congress. The president was actively targeting the vice president and it was pretty much the premise of like twelve different Gerard Butler movies and is pretty much the reason that we pretend that soldiers are supposed to question the chain of command and so forth.

      The military and national guard actively sat on their hands and waited to see how things would shake out. As much as I hate to acknowledge it, the Secret Service and The Boys in Blue are the ones who saved the country that day.

      So no. The first shot doesn’t matter and there is no guarantee that there would even be an escalation in the face of a violent insurrection. Because there wasn’t.