• aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is really an aesthetic question, and aesthetically I actually like road infrastructure, it feels cyberpunkish to me. And the problem with cyberpunk being dystopian is about the economic/politic systems, not architecture

    • danielbln@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is not Cyberpunk, it’s plain old brutalism. And it’s ugly and depressing, every surface sealed, not a leaf in sight. Cyberpunk doesn’t mean depressing concrete hellscape, this is also Cyberpunk:

      • deus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        To play devil’s advocate (but not really because I actually like brutalist architecture), brutalism can look ugly and depressing, sure, but does not have to. I find that brutalist buildings go remarcably well with vegetation. See:

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can like what you want.

      But I would like to point out that excessive road infrastructure ones with a lot of negatives for the general population.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Aside from the fact that green zones are better aesthetically received on average (there are always exceptions), they also remove a lot of pollution, noise, and as a bonus generate some oxygen, greatly improving city climate, mood of the residents and life expectancy.

  • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like this picture is misleading. The first one was taken a lot further away from those towers and you can see most of the trees were already there. The first picture is also taken in rainy weather which makes everything seem way more dull than it really is. It’s hard to tell what has actually changed between these two pictures, if anything at all.

  • Jeanschyso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    We laugh, but there are a lot of plans across North America to revert the overuse of car infrastructure. Even Quebec small town, who love saying they’re the opposite of Montreal, are desifying and giving up on doubling lanes on roads, adding bike paths and attempting to work with what they have to reduce solo car usage.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dunno about a canal in a populated area, that’s breeding grounds for bugs. Definitely down with fucking the car-centric building we have now though.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s mostly only standing water that breeds insects. If the canal is moving it should be fine.

        • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is because they’re too south to be northerners and to north to be southerners. The literal middle child of England. Every time you have to drive down south and it’s either pay to take the M6 toll road or deal with going closer to Birmingham, every stingy northerner is thinking in their head “fuck, this is a difficult choice”.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They did similar things in Seoul (albeit not nearly as beautiful), and I’ve seen them in Japan. You’re not going to have many bugs, because at the end of the day it’s still only a dozen meters wide in the middle of the city.

  • t1ppz3r0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the city of utrecht. One of the biggest cities of the Netherlands. They started restoring the city center about 15 years ago. The traffic was either put outside or reduced. Biking, trams and buses take care of mass transit. It’s parts of the cu2030 project (stations gebieded) https://cu2030.nl/ if you want to know more. the project has been a great success and is used as a blueprint for other cities in the country.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    We ain’t doing shit “when the boomers die” except fight over water and resources on a dying world. Like, I appreciate the optimism, but…

    • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not only that, cities don’t even want to pony up the cash for repairing potholes let alone massive landscaping projects.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Besides that a significant portion of the youth is turning hard-right as we speak. Young progressives always think all young people are like them.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s paired with an even greater portion turning far-left. Overall, Gen Z is far more progressive than reactionary, though there are radical fascists as well.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I haven’t seen any data or polling that supports this. A larger portion of young people are “more liberal,” but I’ve not seen anything that says that the extensions of the far, radical right have been met with equal (let alone greater) turns towards leftist political ideology.

          Perhaps you just mean center-left people refer to themselves as “leftists” more often? That’s more of a result of the shift in the Overton window than any actual groundswell of leftist support.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Thanks for the Wikipedia link.

              That you don’t see the difference between the hyper-radicalization of the right and the “progressive pro-government” tendencies of Gen Z is precisely what I’m describing.

              You spend most of your time on this platform talking about videogames and coffee occasionally punctuated by airy anti-capitalist sentiments. The young–and typically white and male–hard right talk about guns and politics, errant and blind though it is, and they train for revolution.

              There is no growing revolutionary sentiment on the left that is meeting, matching, or exceeding the violent revolutionary discourse and “propaganda of the deed” by the right.

              We’re losing. Hiding behind a hope expressed by a Wikipedia article that maybe this “progressive” and “pro government” sentiment is actually what will pull us out of this death spiral actually makes me more pessimistic about the future.

              Go play Starfield.

              “Haha.”

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                There’s radicalization on both sides, but the general trend is to the left.

                What prompted you to dig through my comment history? That’s extremely weird.

                • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Well, my point is, no, it’s not. One “side” is growing more radical, and the other “side” is being more adamant about their social media comments. Does that seem equal to you?

                  “Dig” through your comment history? I took 30 seconds, clicked on your name, scrolled a few times, and then came back. What prompted me to do that? To see if your general profile matches the broad Pollyanna ignorance you’re expressing in this conversation.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        a significant portion of the youth is turning hard-right as we speak

        Normal thing to happen when the enthusiasm of youth is blunted by betrayal and rejection and defeat.

        Like, fuck Fascism, but I can’t really blame a guy who has soured on the whole “Hope and Change” thing. Then having your brain hooked up to the YouTube algorithm of Andrew Tates and JBPs just blasting away all the braincells that aren’t killed by booze and vaping…

        The allure of Fascism is the promise of a big ethnic club to end your sense of alienation and despair combined with a near-to-hand enemy you can lash out at with the consent of the police. The Methamphetamine of ideologies - powerful highs and hard crashes. Its what you take when you’re scrambling at the edge of a psychic pit.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why not just make a green space? Whats the point of bulldozing and flooding the land underneath the highway? Did a representative for the mosquitos make this meme?

    • Pietson@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      IIRC it was a river before it was a highway, and they decided to restore it to it’s natural state.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      THE MOSQUITO LOBBY

      I KNEW IT

      I’m pretty sure this meme is just suggesting making green spaces out of former highways, not literally turning it into a canal.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also, the river probably doesn’t suit the transportation of goods necessary for high population densities. Maybe an underground rail?

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Okay, pal, go ahead and transport 30,000 kilos of produce upriver within the next 2 days 16 times and tell me how efficient this river idea works out.

          Spoiler: It’s gonna be terrible.

            • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I don’t think the Goudvis cargo ship’s 18 Meter Width is going to fit in the canal depicted above in Utrecht, just a hunch. I can’t speak for this cargo ship specifically but cargo ships in general are incapable of going upriver.

              • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Feel free to nitpick this random image I got from the internet somewhere, but if you’re really that worried; there’s still a road next to the canal.

                • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’re complaining that I gave your low effort reply a decent counter argument? I feel like that’s a you problem.

      • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The dutch have more than one road (surprising, I know). Removing the eyesore won’t impact their shipping and transport

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Removing a 4 or 6 way interchange absolutely would impact shipping and transport, which is why I suggested underground rail as a replacement.

          • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            As neither of us are civil engineers, I’m going to stick with my intuition on this until you can provide proof of impact.

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You mean bulldozing and flooding the land that they drained and paved? It was a canal before it was paved in the 70’s

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re Dutch.

      They get all antsy-in-their-pantsy of they can’t see water from where they’re standing.

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You know that you don’t have to wait til they die, right? We can expedite the process if we have the…(coughs) “armory’” to do so.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You’ll have to tell the community of gen-Zers that they’re not allowed to live under that bridge first.