GreyShuck@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 6 months agoTwo charged for pouring porridge and jam on Queen Victoria bust in Glasgowwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTwo charged for pouring porridge and jam on Queen Victoria bust in Glasgowwww.theguardian.comGreyShuck@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months ago victimless crime They damaged a statue that belongs to a publicly owned local museum…
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoThey put more history in it. That’s practically a service to the museum, a value add. Ought to be commemorated for it, really.
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-26 months agoThey will be commemorated, by the prison system putting more history into them.
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoimporting the yankee’s hardon for punishment, i see
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoI’m just using your logic.
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-26 months agoTreating things as things -> me, cool, historical Treating people as things -> you, “logical”
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoYeah, bunch of useful idiots, bots, and shills spreading authoritarian propaganda.
minus-squareDeceptichum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-26 months agoWhich is owned by the city, they damaged a statue owned by the city. Big fucking deal mate. No one was actually hurt.
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoSo there was no victims ofJanuary 6th either because the capital building is publicly owned too?
minus-squareDeceptichum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoYou’re right, defacing a statue is the same as attempting insurrection, doubly so where people were assaulted or died. That’s your fucking amazing retort is it?
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoMy retort is that “it’s publicly owned so it’s fine if anyone destroys it” is a stupid argument no matter who makes it
minus-squareDeceptichum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoIt’s called nuance. Not everything is exactly the same in the world.
minus-squareD61 [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoThey poured what I eat for breakfast every morning on a chunk of stone. I think it’ll be fine.
They damaged a statue that belongs to a publicly owned local museum…
*they poured jam over a statue
They put more history in it. That’s practically a service to the museum, a value add. Ought to be commemorated for it, really.
They will be commemorated, by the prison system putting more history into them.
importing the yankee’s hardon for punishment, i see
I’m just using your logic.
Treating things as things -> me, cool, historical
Treating people as things -> you,
“logical”
Least deranged hexbear user
Yeah, bunch of useful idiots, bots, and shills spreading authoritarian propaganda.
Which is owned by the city, they damaged a statue owned by the city.
Big fucking deal mate. No one was actually hurt.
So there was no victims ofJanuary 6th either because the capital building is publicly owned too?
You’re right, defacing a statue is the same as attempting insurrection, doubly so where people were assaulted or died.
That’s your fucking amazing retort is it?
My retort is that “it’s publicly owned so it’s fine if anyone destroys it” is a stupid argument no matter who makes it
It’s called nuance.
Not everything is exactly the same in the world.
They poured what I eat for breakfast every morning on a chunk of stone. I think it’ll be fine.