• Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do think they’re trying, but its gotta be complex and error-prone to extrapolate like that, especially if there’s some confounding factor that correlates to the likelihood of receiving an answer.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah but that’s why these people are professionals. Of course it’s complicated to do this but statisticians do it all the time. If there’s a known confounding factor (e.g. young people don’t answer calls) then it can be adjusted for. I know polling isn’t perfect but I find these points are less “I have a technical point about the problems with extrapolation/interpolation” and more “This poll doesn’t show what I want so there must be a problem”

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think it is telling how difficult it can be to accurately predict based on polls and all other available data by how rare it is for a professional analyst to make an accurate prediction on something like a federal election 12 or 8 months away.

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Really? What about 2020

          Almost all correctly predicted a Biden win. We don’t need the precise number just the general lay of the land

          • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            There were plenty of predictions that got the winner right, but the amount that accurately predicted the ~51/47 are much fewer and I believe the rarity is an indicator that accurate prediction is not as clear and straight forward as some may expect even with statistical training.