kinther@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 months agoStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.comexternal-linkmessage-square246fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.comkinther@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square246fedilink
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoCould someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
minus-squarestrawberry@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoI mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
minus-squareassassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoI mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.
minus-squareGlitterInfection@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoThat would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.
Could someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
I mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing
not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
I mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.
That would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.