• Khanzarate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It seems not a slam dunk here, to me, specifically because of the first section. Starbucks is not required to offer non-dairy milk as an accommodation, according to your first quote.

    Since Starbucks is not required to offer non-dairy milk, that last paragraph doesn’t apply at all, because they aren’t charging more for a required accommodation.