• The House passed a more than $60 billion bill that provides more military aid to Ukraine.
  • It’s part of a larger foreign aid package that’s likely to pass the Senate and be signed into law.
  • 112 Republicans voted it against — the most ever, and a majority of the GOP conference.

Saturday’s vote marked the first time the House had approved billions of dollars in Ukraine aid since December 2022, when Democrats still controlled the chamber.

In the two years since Russia’s invasion, opposition to aiding Ukraine has grown from a fringe position to a majority view among House GOP lawmakers. Many argue the money should be spent domestically or that policy changes at the US-Mexico border should take precedence.

Here are the 112 House Republicans who voted against the bill.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Republicans then: Yay McCarthyism!

    Republicans now: Daddy Putin, please step on my face uwu!

    • Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      nyaaaaaaah putin >w< i wanna be one of your chiwd sowlders twerks in mass war crime

      - leaked imessage between matt gaetz and putin, probably

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Its the same picture. McCarthyism was far more about whipping domestic residents into subservience than opposing some foreign menace. The Republican alignment with Daddy Vlady is now just a litmus test for party line faithfulness. A kind of partisan hazing ritual, where you have to go on cable news and say the thing that will get liberals to boo at you, so you can prove you’re not one of them.

      Then you can start hitting the harder stuff. You get into the QAnon kool-aid that convinces you there’s a vast pedophile conspiracy to enslave white children, and only the most orthodox right-wing evangelicals can protect you from it.

      Modern day Birchers have far more beef with China than Russia anyway. For, uh… reasons.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fact that the only Nays were Republicans speaks volumes. The Republican party has been compromised by Russia, it’s the only explanation that makes sense.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And, to clarify for future readers, this vote was only for the Ukraine Aid portion of the package. Each part got a separate vote. So even though the package includes Israeli funding, it wasn’t part of this particular vote which was exclusively about aid to Ukraine.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if this list also list of yacht owners.

  • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The money isn’t going to turn the tide against Russia. Ukraine has no chance of winning. It is just math. Joe Biden has no interest for the well-being of Ukraine. It is preferred for the US that Ukraine bleed Russia. This means every last Ukrainian.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, what the fuck even is this bullshit?

      Ukraine is fighting an invading force that is kidnapping children and targeting infrastructure. They have no choice but to keep fighting. Without financial and military support, Ukraine will cease to be.

      You’re not wrong that America benefits from the proxy war that has weakened Putin militarily and politically. Putin, like Trump, is a punkass bitch who is willing to kill to keep projecting power.

      If America stops supporting Ukraine, that’s not in anyone’s best interest except Putin.

      • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        With or without financial aid, Ukraine will lose. It is math. Russians invaded Ukraine because the US was trying to isolate Russia from Ukraine. This means no tolerance for pro-Russian Ukrainian presidents; the coup of 2014 that overturned the democratic vote, and the subsequent declarations of independent republics in the Donbas because of the color revolution that undermined democracy. NATO afterward starting arming and training Ukrainians will promote NATO and EU membership. NATO is a US organization, and NATO foreign policy is US foreign policy. Europeans are subservient to the US for security. Most European states don’t support the war in Ukraine privately, but for the sake of NATO unity, they publically support it, because the US pays for NATO defense.

        • andxz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you sure you know any math, in general? You sure seem to like that phrase, yet you don’t do any.

          As for the rest, you might as well write in russian, because that’s exactly what it sounds like - brainwashed russian bullshit. It’s especially telling that you think that the European countries don’t care what happens to Ukraine. That’s such utter idiocy that it could only come from Russia.

          • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The money only accelerates their demise. It is not helpful for Ukraine. It is the opposite. If Biden really cared about the Ukrainian people, he would call up a cease fire. He wants no peace deal. He wants only war. NATO is counting on the Ukrainian nationalist to send every man to their death.

            • ormr@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Gtfo russian troll. Yeah, I look at the last three years and think: Biden… He only wants war!! Lmao

              • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Joe Biden signed a bill that funds the military or supports the military of Taiwan, Israel, and Ukraine. Yes, he loves war. Just because he uses others as pawns doesn’t make him eligible for Nobel Peace Prize. Joe Biden is a foreign asset, a war criminal, he is compromised and intimidated. He is subordinate to US agencies and foreign lobbies. It can be argued that Joe Biden is a traitor. Biden’s voting record speaks for itself.

          • rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Look at the language. “Biden regime” “2014 coup”.

            It’s written in English, but it sure sounds Russian.

            • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              4 day old account, most of it comments like this, probably getting paid in rubles. Block that shit if you value your reading time.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I mean, maybe you’re right about it being impossible for Ukrain to win. Putin is committed to hiding his fear with violence.

          The “coup” in 2014 was made much easier when Yanukovych murdered a bunch of unarmed protestors and then fled the country to hide under Putin’s skirt.

          NATO is a coalition of countries, which includes the USA. You’re kidding yourself if you think the EU doesn’t support Ukraine. Every EU country wants Ukrainian exports, and all of them are concerned with Russian aggression against foreign sovereign powers. The only EU country that doesn’t support defending Ukraine against invasion is Hungary, but we all know that the whiny shitbag Orban has been licking Putin’s balls in exchange for power.

          • Amoxtli@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not all countries in the EU support Ukraine. It is not in their interest to support the conflict in Ukraine. If Russia was such a looming threat, they would have paid their fair share in NATO military funding. Barack Obama pointed this out, not just Trump. Obviously, they preferred to get rich, instead of spend money on the military. Viktor Orbán is the sanest leader in the EU because he tells it like it is. A Russian threat is greatly inflated with myths of a new USSR. Russians are not ideologically communist, and they have no interest in controlling other European people. They have been there and done that. The Soviets had to deal with uprising and insubordinate leaders when they controlled Eastern Europe. Uprisings in Romania and Hungary. Ukraine is a security matter for Russia. There is no imperial motivation for it. It was well established long before this conflict that NATO expansion into Ukraine would be a disaster. Angela Merkel and Sarkozy said this much including Bill Burns as Secretary of State, and ambassador. Bill Burns still works in the US government.

        • ormr@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wrong. EU countries have given over 50 billion $ support so far. Germany alone has given roughly 28 billion. There’s only a handful states that are in opposition against it, including lighthouses of democracy like Hungary…

      • felixthecat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What is that post you’re replying to? Is obvious tankie propaganda.

        If you asked me in 2019 if I thought who would win between Russia and Ukraine I would have said no doubt Russia would win. After they took Crimea in 2014 it seemed it was only a matter of time. But after Ukraine successfully fought back Russia from taking Kyiv at the start of the war now I’m sure if Ukraine had the the proper funding they could defeat Russia.

        Watching Russia actually mobilize and use some of the ancient tanks that modern weapons easily penatrate and destroy…and to see that they were even desperate enough to dig in and go through the red forest at Chernobyl to try to take Kyiv and still failed…it showed how desperate, under-funded, weak, and terribly lead the Russians are. It seems the only way Russia can beat this tiny nation is by literally throwing millions of men at bullets and hope that the Ukrainian defenders run out of ammo.

        If Ukraine can be properly funded it will win. If you know you have the ammo and supply chains needed to keep the Ukrainian front line defenders properly supplied, just throwing away Russian lives endlessly wont work. Tankies desperately need the western populations to turn against funding the war in Ukraine because Russia has already been completely embarrassed in this war. The first major protests against putin inside Russia by armed mercenaries have happened directly as a result of this war. Putin could very well end up dead and Russia could have a whole new system of government if Ukraine is able to stabilize and push back in the coming years. People in Russia are tired of the war, Putin NEEDS a total victory to stay in power.

        Don’t let tankies convince you otherwise. The fact this war is still going on and that Russia has won so little territory from Ukraine shows that Russia is extremely weak. A properly funded Ukraine can win. Putin could easily end up dead, he is extremely paranoid. The fact that the Wagner group staged an armed protest in Russia is huge. All it will take is the right spark in Russia and there could be a massive revolt against the Russian government.

        The only other way I see Russia winning is by using nukes. But if that happens I don’t think Nato or the rest of the world would just let it slide…most likely it would lead to WW3.

  • Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know this isn’t why they voted against it, but the mass surveillance / censorship bill tacked onto this that’s vainly disguised as a TikTok ban is pretty scary.

    Fuck the GOP.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      So you’re fighting on the front lines in Ukraine? Why not advocate that the US go to war with Russia directly? You just want to prolong things out for a few months, and then a few more months… Aid package after aid package tied to Israel genocide and all kinds of concessions for Republicans, while pretending that it was always about trying to “help” Ukraine

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Common misconception but no, actually, each portion got a separate vote. 112 legislators voted against aid to Ukraine, 58 voted against aid to Israel.

        • ultranaut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          In this instance they had to unbundle them because of the overlapping opposition to the different elements. Combined all of that opposition was enough to sink the whole thing, separated no one issue had enough opposition to fail.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The senate has to vote on it as a bundle or send it back to the house if I’m not mistaken, but the house got to vote on individual things. I hope I’m wrong, Ukraine needs us but also Fuck Israel.

  • computerscientistI@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is this supposed to be some kind of public shaming? It’s not as if there weren’t any reasons not to issue a blank check to Ukraine.

    A comprehensible way to view this war is: One corrupt shit-hole country, formerly part of the Soviet Unions has attacked another corrupt shit-hole country, formerly part of the Soviet Union.

    I am German and I am happy with giving the Ukraine plenty of funds and other means in order for enabling them to stop Russia expending in my general direction. I don’t really see that much benefit for the US so. But thanks, every US dollar spent is about 1€ less we have to spend. Go for it.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s a very cheap and low effort way to reduce Russia’s ability to invade across Europe and stomp a bunch of NATO countries.

    • Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every dollar spent by the US on Ukraine helps undermine Russia’s global influence and protects NATO, which was the US’s goal for like 70 years now.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      At the very least, they should help because they promised to. In 1994 Ukraine gave up its nukes (it had the 3rd largest arsenal). It did this with assurances that the US, UK and Russia would all respect its existing borders.

      By not helping Ukraine resist Russia, the US is reneging on that promise (by letting Russia change the borders).

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m all for countries standing by their commitments, long term. The risks of not disarming Ukraine, particularly back then, is more than worth the cost now.

          Appeasement is rarely a good idea, long term, no matter which warmonger it’s aimed at.

          • lobotomo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So few people understand this. It’s akin to the Jan 6 morons puking about the Capitol building being “our house”. Not it fucking isn’t, it’s the government’s building. Chanting “we the people” like morons only points out that you haven’t read or don’t understand the rest of the fucking preamble.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sounds very much like your opnion is formed based on general ignorance on the subject, sprinkled with a good dosage of egotism

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also a huge benefit to our economy and (eventually) military readiness. We’re giving mostly older but still useful weapons, and most of the money goes to US defense companies to replenish our supplies with the latest and greatest.

      Yeah, we’ve been running way too much debt and need to get a handle on it but this is a good use of debt and the problem is much bigger than this one “minor” part

    • xionzui@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Making it very clear to the world you can’t just march into a neighboring sovereign country and take it over is very important for global security. That matters to all of us. We as a society should not accept that.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The US has the same benefits as Germany. It is bad for an aggressive adversarial state to invade their way through Europe.

      The US gives them funding by selling them equipment the US was done with. The country gets to collect shitloads of data on using the weapons in a proxy war they don’t have to commit to.

    • irreticent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve heard that Marjorie Taylor Greene is just Dog the Bounty Hunter in drag. I mean, has anyone seen the two of them in the same place at the same time?

      Also, I’ve heard that she (he?) has a cleft butthole.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For those who don’t know, The New York Post was the first American media outlet that Rupert Murdoch brought back in the day. It tries to play off being ‘center Right’ as opposed to Fox News. Following the spin on the spin can break your neck.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s a New York paper, so they can hate on MGT. They don’t have to be consistent with the message from one branch tp the other.

          I remember back in 2008. The Post had two op-ed pieces on the same page. One writer said that Obama was just another neoliberal hack who’d push a softer version of GOP plans and the voters should just opt for McCain. The other said that Obama was a hard Left radical who would about an extremist agenda.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The Post had two op-ed pieces on the same page. One writer said that Obama was just another neoliberal hack who’d push a softer version of GOP plans and the voters should just opt for McCain. The other said that Obama was a hard Left radical who would about an extremist agenda.

            It’s choose your own hatred adventure!

      • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        He already is winning. Look at a map of controlled areas by Russia vs ukraine. Watch analysis by Scott Ritter and John mersheimer.

          • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Your classification of them as far right says everything about your ignorance. Is everyone who doesn’t agree with you far right? Did you know that both soctt and John consider what’s going in palestine a genocide? Or can you not comprehend nuance and just like to stay in an echo chamber where you feel validated with your beliefs?

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nah, they’re not far right. One’s a sex offender and the other spews Putin’s words as truths, despite evidence to the contrary. Facts keep changing, yet mearsheimer’s “beliefs” do not. To him Putin isn’t an imperialist dictator despite the fact that he keeps annexing more and more land to russia by invading sovereign countries and has been “president” for over 2 decades while his opponents keep falling out of windows and such. 2014 was a coup, obviously, because Ukrainians couldn’t possibly be opposed to getting closer to Russia, etc, etc.

              Please…

        • alienanimals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Putin thought he would take Ukraine in a matter of days. It’s been years.

          The ruble has been hit hard by all the sanctions. The Russian economy has been weakened to divert funds to a war inept Russia can’t even finish. Russia’s infrastructure and money-producing assets like their oil refineries and rail yards are being attacked by Ukrainians as well as partisans within Russia.

          Are Russians killing a lot of Ukrainians? Sure, but they’ve made a laughable amount of progress in Ukraine over the years. Look at the Black Sea fleet numbers. Ultimately Putin is fucking over Russia for a war he can’t finish.

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The US has no intention of ending the war. They want Ukraine to be the next forever war to drive the military industrial complex

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The aid is in the form of outdated, surplus military equipment that was scheduled to be replaced anyways. The alternative is paying a company to dispose of them. So why don’t you want to send this aid to Ukraine where it can be used? The only people that should have any problem with this are those who are busy sucking Putin’s knob.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or people who don’t know anything about what you said because the media just acts like the bill steals money from us to give to them instead

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only people that should have any problem with this are those who are busy sucking Putin’s knob.

        I would like to point out that russia is fine with this war otherwise they wouldn’t have started it. Politicians and government use wars as a tool to get more power and enrich themself which is pretty much what is happening right now too

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Russia isn’t necessarily fine with it just because they started it. After all, they seized Crimea back in 2014 and got away with it without a fight. Russia also made a push to capture Ukraine’s government in a matter of days at the start, which they wouldn’t have done if they didn’t think there was a chance of it succeeding. It’s very possible that Russia expected this to be over quickly and based its decision on that expectation

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            If they are able to bribe 112 US government figures i believe they also weighted in the option that the invasion of a full ass country they have been at war since 2014 could have last more than 3 days

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        A lot of that equipment would’ve just gone back for rework and upgrades. Just because they’re old doesn’t mean they don’t work. That narrative was intended to force the US to by new more expensive hardware instead of repairing what we already have. Now that the old stuff is shipped out there’s a demand for new builds.

        We will only give Ukraine just enough to prolong the war as long as possible. This war means trillions of dollars in sales if it goes on long enough. I bet the US can stretch it up to ten years if they play the same right. And all the while, Ukraine will be bombed to shit, waiting for the US mega corporations to make more money on the reconstruction efforts. They just need to make sure Putin stays in power or the whole scheme falls apart.

        • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So your idea is to let Russia steamroll Ukraine in which Ukraine will still be bombed to shit? Yeah you’re a fucking bootlicker.

          • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The best idea is to force a peace treaty. Tell Putin he can have the land he’s captured if the war ends now. Better to let him take that land than wait until Russian military gets back into Kiev again or other more populous cities in the West. He’ll feel like he’s won and the killing will end. Otherwise there will be no end. Putin will never give up unless the Russian people put his head on a pike. Even if Ukraine somehow manages to push Russian troops back to their borders, the war doesn’t end there and Ukraine isn’t going to conquer Russia.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your post history shows you are intelligent and articulate. I feel that, geopolitically, that is a self-destructive act for our country over time. Why do you feel it’s a bad idea?

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because the US has no intention of saving Ukraine. The intent is for the war to go on as long as possible so we can continue making a shitload of money on selling weapons. As soon as it’s no longer profitable we’ll let Russia roll over Ukraine.

      • Filthmontane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re right for all the wrong reasons. They just support Russia. I just don’t support Ukraine becoming the next forever war.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly what a Russian bot would say.

      But you also like to push Chinese interests, don’t you?

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Since rest of the thread is undirected anger without naming names, let’s name names!