If tax cuts and typical libertarian shenanigans are the cost to take within the system, to end genocide (doubt it, but fingers crossed) then by all means I think it should be taken, if one is to decide to engage with and legitimize the system at all (IMO a futile effort).
All those tax cuts will do, anyways, is further erode and destroy the foundations of the system. I’m not an accelerationist- I believe in working to make things better for people, not worse- but in the face of genocide, absolutely this is the infinitely better (still not ideal, futile, etc) option.
I can see what you mean. There’s also the precedent that this person could do equally heinous shit the second he enters office. There is also the trend that libertarians tend to fall on their face or lose popularity (Aleppo) when they start gaining national steam. If he manages to make an actual debut in politics; sure, why not. I was gonna vote for the worm anyways.
If tax cuts and typical libertarian shenanigans are the cost to take within the system, to end genocide (doubt it, but fingers crossed) then by all means I think it should be taken, if one is to decide to engage with and legitimize the system at all (IMO a futile effort).
All those tax cuts will do, anyways, is further erode and destroy the foundations of the system. I’m not an accelerationist- I believe in working to make things better for people, not worse- but in the face of genocide, absolutely this is the infinitely better (still not ideal, futile, etc) option.
I can see what you mean. There’s also the precedent that this person could do equally heinous shit the second he enters office. There is also the trend that libertarians tend to fall on their face or lose popularity (Aleppo) when they start gaining national steam. If he manages to make an actual debut in politics; sure, why not. I was gonna vote for the worm anyways.