• Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because the gun in question was a revolver, the ammo must also look real

    I have seen so much bad science, like basic physics mistakes, in movies that that’s not really true. The average movie goer isn’t going to know what the difference between a fake and real revolver by sight.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not the point. If you’re swinging around a semi-automatic pistol with an empty magazine, nobody will know. However, with a revolver, you need to load it with real-looking bullets for close-up shots. Of course, at a distance, you can use lesser-quality prop guns.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or you can create, from scratch, purpose built guns with the same spec, but are made of materials(like aluminum) that the holder will know is fake from the moment they pick it up. For larger pieces, you could include a co2 mechanism to recreate recoil and include an LED to light up with a trigger pull for sfx people to use as a reference. Pretty sure some of these things already exist.

        And quite frankly, the audience doesn’t deserve a perfect recreation if it means putting people in harms way. There’s a thing call Suspension of Disbelief that seems to be in short supply these days. Never bring the CinemaSins guy to a traditional Japanese theater. The Kuroko stagehands would give him an hearth attack.