Author Joel Williamson shared Elvis kept a group of three 14-year-old girls with him on the tour who were up "for pillow fights, tickling, kissing and cuddling when he was 22.

  • nikaaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I don’t like saying it because people get very emotional and unreasonable about this but:

    These things were normal a long time ago. It’s only been in recent years, especially starting from the 1960s, that moral panic took over and these things are looked at now as “a crime”.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      it was normal to allow your child to bang adults?

      First time I am hearing of this dear… Do you let adult people to fuck your kids?

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          i guess depending on what is your position on child and adult here…

          but yeah, i don’t think anyone is permitting their jailbait to fuck anyone over 20 in good conscience.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              ok… it was common for parents to allow catholic clergy to fuck their kids and when kid complained they did nothing. what is your point?

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                The distinction between past and present. And more abstractly, not confusing acknowledgement of past moral principles as agreement with them.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  saying it was common back then is tacitly approving of it IMHO

                  but people can make up their own minds.

                  note that many of these people who fucked jail bait are still alive and it is still happening in celebrating circles.

                  did not charlie cheen rape some kid? and there many stories all the disney jailbat being raped?

                  What excuse will society muster for this shit happening in 1990s?

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      emotional and unreasonable

      moral panic took over and these things are looked at now as “a crime”.

      Ah yes, what a neutral and regulated way to phrase that.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I think they meant people’s reaction to the idea that the past could’ve had a different view on it that we view as disgusting rather than implying it’s “emotional and unreasonable” to view criminalized pedophilia as a “moral panic”, but I’m not a telepath. That was just my reading of it.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Plenty of famous people were scumbags. Violent, racist, misogynist, beat up women, cheated, etc. From John Wayne to Frank Sinatra, they were awful human beings but people worship them.

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Priscilla was 14 when they met, and he managed to convince her father to let her live with him. I blame the father just a much since he knew what was going down.

    • lemmyviking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not that I condone any of this, but consider that the cultural disgust of marrying a girl under the age of 18 is a more recent and modern taboo. Back then, in rural United States, it wasn’t an issue at all. Heck as a Gen X kid whose parents were from the Silent Generation, my mother married her first husband when she was 16 and he was 22. She never thought it was an issue other than she regretted marrying anyone at the age. But her parents, church, and teachers didn’t think it was a problem.

      It’s hard to believe because most people might say Elvis lived in modern society but he’s not. The 20th century was full of changes that we don’t really think about.

      • psion1369@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I agree with you on that. And the changes still are going on. I remember in school in the 90’s it wasn’t uncommon for a college guy to date a high school girl with no real repercussion. Not saying that it was right back then, just looked at differently.

        • weariedfae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          It was gross back then too. In the 90s the Coasties would trawl the junior high girls. 25 year old men “dating” 13 year olds. We all knew it was gross as fuck and not okay but small town cops didn’t give a fuck. Hell there was a deputy “dating” a 16 year old too.

          It wasn’t looked at differently in the 90s.

          A guy in my class knocked up a 14 year old during senior year and we basically all stopped talking to him because fucking ew, dude.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I absolutely hate (not dislike) that “huah” vocal noise that’s commonly associated with him and think any human making that noise needs to be taken out immediately.

    I’ve never heard anything about any of this but I absolutely hate him and any contract he made on society simply as a product of the horror of that noise.

    I exaggerate for humor, clearly, but I really do absolutely hate that noise and do not give it a single shred of artistic respect at all, it’s flatly and out-of-hand declined any consideration for credit at all and people that like him as an artist I will literally completely discount any of their artistic opinions.

    I have the same artistic hate for Elvis that I have political and personal hate for Trump.

    I don’t even have a way to know exactly what it is but just hearing his voice immediately sends me into a blinding rage. It’s not to my knowledge some kinda trauma type of memory associated with it, because I was only exposed to enough of it to just recognize the voice. There are just a few things I know of that make me that angry that quickly. One of them is having to backtrack. Like realizing you forgot a critical grocery and having to go back to the store immediately, or forgetting to bring that one super important thing to work and you have to go back for it before going in. That part multiplies with any kind of time pressure.

    But Elvis hits me in the same kind of spot. A randomly specific and very reactive trigger. Well I say reactive but I just end up telling at myself and increasing blood pressure for a few minutes. I don’t literally go into a fugue state and start dropping people.

    All that just to say that with me he is absolutely NOT loved and the little bit I heard about some kind of drama with the Graceland estate makes me laugh myself silly because screw those people, the whole lot of them. Do fans of Elvis even care a little bit about any of the family careers? It doesn’t seem so to me, but I’m not an expert.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    This, but also rape and other abuse was tolerated for some reason back then.

    There is also a bit of a gender disparity for who is getting help now. Women can get help a lot more easy than men, and aren’t as likely to be dismissed when they come forward.

    Lets keep pushing in the right direction

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Most people weren’t even aware of it.

      The general public knowing every little detail about a celebrity’s life simply wasn’t a thing then.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        People wrote songs about it. Famous songs that you know the words to. People knew, they just didn’t care.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      The sad truth is that it was a very common practice. Just wait until they hear about Jerry Lee Lewis.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        And the Grateful Dead (sure Bob, you waited while she slept outside your room every night for 3 years), Chuck Berry, Jimmy Page, Led Zeppelin, and about a hundred other groups. Hell, Kiss had the Christine Sixteen song, Jethro Tull had Aqualung, Seventeen by Winger, Into the Night by Benny Mardones, and a bunch of other songs have super uncomfortable lyrics about girls.

        That’s not even getting into well known shit bags like Nugent.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        At least one of the fathers openly endorsed it. I don’t think fathers cared as much about it as you think.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Paedophilia seemed weirdly acceptable right up until around 2000 or so. It’s really quite surreal how commonplace it was.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Because his fame comes from an era when that kind of age gap and inappropriate conduct was handwaved away with “fRoM a GoOd FaMiLy!”

    Especially in his native southern US. Especially especially among the white folks in his native southern US.

  • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    As disgusting as we see it now, keep in mind that, back then, child marriage was not only condoned but sometimes encouraged in those parts of the Southern U.S.

    We’ll never know if he did it because he had a thing for young girls, or if he did it simply because it was an accepted practice.

    Regardless of why, it’s objectively terrible that he did that.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Fun fact: there’s no such thing as objective morality. Back in the 1920s people thought it was objectively terrible for Black people to have equal rights.

      • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        I said it was objectively terrible, I didn’t mention morals. :)

        Harming people is terrible, whether or not social morality supports it.

          • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            No, but it was harmful.

            I’m talking about the objective harm of encouraging underage girls to avoid study and live their lives in the service of older men. There is nothing good that can be said about such a thing. It’s basically indentured servitude.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              Ok, it wasn’t seen as relatively more harmful than anything else that would cause strain in a young person’s social, educational, and professional growth. Like an overinterest in sports or gambling or books.

              • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                I’m not talking about how it was seen. I’m talking about how it is. There’s a difference.

                Cutting off hands was seen as socially acceptable at certain times in history, if someone was merely accused of theft. But it is horrific and terrible. How it was seen as irrelevant to it being terrible objectively terrible.

                Are you just trolling, or are you actually trying to defend some of that behavior?

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  I’m not talking about how it was seen. I’m talking about how it is.

                  Ok, have fun with that, because that’s not what I was talking about at all.

                  are you actually trying to defend some of that behavior?

                  Fuck you for trying to win internet points by trying to paint someone as agreeing with pedophilia. It’s fucking disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Age of consent is not the same as age an adult is allowed to be with a minor. Minors should be allowed to consent to have sex, just not with much older people. Laws that prosecute, say, a 19 year old from having sex with a 17 years old, or god forbid two 14 years olds to have sex together, are absolutely draconian.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Actually, that’s exactly what age of consent is. The age at which you’re allowed to do things with an adult of any age.

          Romeo and Juliet (or close in age) exceptions are for the situation you’re describing, and are usually tacked onto age of consent laws as an exception.

          In Canada, there’s a pair of these. At 14 and 15 it’s less than 5 years older, and at 12 and 13 it’s less than 2 years older.