![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
I listened to a couple of episodes about 6 years ago. They weren’t that great.
I listened to a couple of episodes about 6 years ago. They weren’t that great.
Exactly.
It’s designed to be feel punitive.
Sorry mate, people have been moaning about migrants and airbnb since forever?
It’s a complex problem with multiple drivers, but no motivation from the populace to solve any of them.
Surely you’re aware of the embrace, extend, extinguish corporate strategy.
People only get to decide what they want from their platform until facebook starts extending the spec. Then your client will become incompatible with some posts, and so on and so forth.
In summary, it’s a threat to the platform itself.
If there was a bot that just flooded All with far right talking points, do you think admins ought to block that or leave it to the users?
What if it was far right mixed in with cat memes?
What if it started more slowly like a few posts an hour and then ramped up over 6 months to be 1000s of posts per hour?
What play could that make
Oh I don’t know, perhaps contrition?
Yeah look, everyone has to find their own way, I’m not trying to make the case that catch & release is going to be better for everyone, and there’s certainly a case to be made for archiving.
The thing that eventually got me was maintaining a big raid array. Lots of heat, power, drives dying every now and again. When it only takes a few minutes to download something and I never go near my bandwidth quota (or it’s unlimited maybe) going to catch & release made a lot of sense. I’m not religious about it but I generally delete things after I’ve listened / watched.
There was threats against them also right? So maybe relocating, some kind of on-call security or something, IDK.
He acknowledged in his closing argument that “my client has committed wrongful conduct against” the pair and had “harmed” them, but asked the jury to keep in mind the good Giuliani had done in his lifetime.
He told them the message he believed they should send is, “You should have been better, but you’re not as bad as the plaintiffs are making you out to be.”
This has to be the worst closing argument ever. This might work if say, a teacher commits a drink driving offense, or a crosswalk attendant steals some laundry detergent, but “think of all the good” that this sycophant did in his life is just going to inspire heavier penalties.
The only way to answer this question is to investigate the circumstances of specific examples.
Generally, the person just doesn’t have the money. If Giuliani bought his nephew $100m in shares 10 years ago, who’s to say those shares do not in fact belong to the nephew.
do donations need to be truthful in plain terms of how the funds are used ?
I think in 2023 parlance the claim is probably plain enough to be “truthful”.
Giving gold supports the contributors you love
It’s pretty well established that receiving gold on reddit is perks like… a gold star or something, rather than actual real gold.
I’ve been catch and release for 5 years or so now.
Archiving is such a huge drain on time / effort / resources.
Would a timeline really provide much benefit over viewing screenshots in a folder?
This one has a calendar:
https://m.majorgeeks.com/files/details/auto_screen_capture.html
That’s not how polling works
Not really.
Cancel all mygov accounts that are using secret questions as 2 factor auth. Job done.
Most of the “scammers” are peoples junkie kids. I shit you not.
They can’t / won’t do that though because then you can’t blame old / poor people for being old / poor and not being able to access services.
Auto cookie delete isn’t really necessary since total cookie protection.
For me, I often get to Friday afternoon and realise I haven’t recorded my time all week.
Supposed to be billing clients for tasks.
Screen caps every 15 minutes helps me see what I was doing
Sharex auto capture?
Tax agent here.
I’ve seen a bunch of tax payers fall victim to this. It’s not sophisticated. Just answer people’s secret questions to access their mygov accounts. That’s it.
Thereafter it’s trivial to request changes to a tax return that will generate a refund of $20k, whatever really.
It would be trivial for the ATO to intercept. A highschool student could write a database query to reveal the fraudulent changes.
Since no one else has said it… 80 days podcast: