See, “Lexathoidiopterix” is just not a great name though.
See, “Lexathoidiopterix” is just not a great name though.
Eat the pizzas and keep fighting.
Tiger chiefing on a fat doink
That’s not what this post is about.
Me remembering my wife telling me to get “just the essentials” at the grocery store eyeing up the ciggies, beer, and lottery tickets with our families last 20$ until payday in my pocket.
I would bet it could be more common with old rifles when they had worse quality metal.
💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵🍆💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵
Democratic socialists also have had a small but established coalition in the house and Senate for decades too.
It’s crazy that Trump is being used as the harbinger of Christian nationlism. It’s ironically because he has no morals and will say/do anything to get himself elected.
Not that it makes it a better argument, but the meme was that millennials were going out to restaurants for an 11$ latte and 15$ avocado toast instead of staying home for breakfast. The whole point, to them, was that coffee and avocado toast had some of the cheapest ingredients you could ever ask for.
In my experience Adderall also gave me depression++ when I would come down at night.
Are the genders with you right now?
This is called a motte-and-bailey. We were discussing a group trying to ban books about the Holocaust, and the larger concept about groups of parents being able to ban anything by whining about it enough. You put forward a different argument you think is bullet proof about banning sexual content with the implication that this argument defends the much weaker argument about banning Holocaust books or whatever books the mob may choose.
Just pointing that out. It’s a common fallacy and one that feels right, it isn’t necessarily done intentionally.
The freakout about sexual content is fabricated and designed to play to emotions. School libraries already ban sexual content. There’s no smut or erotica at them. The small handful of books that people wanted to ban were either educational or were similar to many books that were not targeted by those parent groups and the sexual situations were not the focus of the book. The main similarity was that they were about LGBT sexualities.
Because the rules are in place and curated by professionals. What I don’t want is every semi-educated group of extremists to have the ability to whine enough that they get important books banned.
We’re literally the family with the drunk uncle who’s really fun at parties but now the alcoholism has caught up and he just gets sad and angry when he gets drunk.
For higher level maths you can easily make a final where googling the solution if you don’t know it will just slow you down.
I’m wondering if it’s why I don’t get so much as a rejection email for many of the jobs I’ve applied for. It always feels like submitting an application is just tossing it into the void but this study seems to corroborate that.
Yeah, people talking about proportional representation seem to turn a blind and eye to the Senate, which has had principled socialists and libertarians in its seats. It’s not a healthy state of affairs, but if you wanted to send a message to the Democrats theres a proven way to do it in house and Senate races, trying to make big swings at the presidential level is just idiotic and betrays bad faith.
Lol it shows people can be as bad as ai at drawing hands.
Really though, she has a finger coming out of the same joint as the extended finger? Or is she using her ring finger to hold the card? And it seems like she has two fingers stuffed into the glove but also it’s extended all the way out like it’s just one finger.