• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Hmm, the real question is whether this is consistent year over year… beating the S&P500 one year doesn’t really indicate anything.

    Also there are 535 people in the US congress but only like 30 on these two lists… and not the same 30 both years. How many lost money in those same years?

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The list is much longer if you search for it, that’s hysterical the ones above and close to the same return as SPY

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Assuming you meant “historical”, then these two years of data imply that ~5% of congress members beat the S&P500 per year, and not the same people every year… which seems statistically insignificant.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know what happened with my auto correct on that word as I think I meant to say “only” 🤔

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ah, well there you go then… 25ish people out of 535?

            Again, it’d be worrying if the same people were consistently ahead of the market… but that would also be super obvious.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yep, people make a big thing out of it and maybe the proportion of them that beat SPY is higher than the proportion of random investors that do it, but there’s no good way to say 🤷

          • GenEcon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Thanks! This completly debunks the insider trade myth. You would expect a Gaussian distribution around the mean, which would be a market neutral index. And you get even a slightly to the left shifted Gaussian bell curve.