In every election “left-leaning” neoliberals always try to guilt-trip Marxists into voting for their candidates with the usual schpiel: “Your party doesn’t have enough votes to win. You are just letting conservatives win”. What do you tell these people?

  • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They lied about ending concentration camps for migrants and I will absolutely never vote for a Democrat again because of that

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did they even say they were going to get rid of them or just that they would go back to locking up families together?

      For sure AOC hasn’t been to one for a press visit since Biden took over

      • Star Wars Enjoyer @lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        in the elections they claimed they’d end the camps, it was one of their major lines against Trump.

        All they did was keep kids from being separated from parents, then suppressed the whole thing.

    • _wintermute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will absolutely never vote for a Democrat again because of that

      Not because the democrats have consistently failed the working class for the past several decades, but because you believed a virtue signaling corporate democrat was going to actually care enough to change the situation at the border. Peak neoliberal bullshit lmao also this is exactly how conservative voters think.

      • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost like the leader of the Democrats represents all of them. Fuck off with this. Stopping concentration camps isn’t virtue signaling. You can go back to your Fox News with that bullshit

    • Black AOC@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Based. If a neoliberal wants to talk at me about voting for their dumpsterfire candidates and expects me to not verbally assault them with theory in response, they gotta be payin me.

  • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tell them if they want my vote they can have it by just seriously embracing two (only two) of the following:

    Drug legalization
    Vacancy control
    Massive increase in funding non-profit housing
    Massive increase in train infrastructure
    Free public transit
    Significant reduction in military budget
    Withdraw from NATO
    End fossil fuel subsidies
    China-style expansion of solar and wind farming
    House the homeless in permanent housing
    Criminalize corporate lobbying
    Complete provision of free health care for all including mental health and dentistry
    Debt jubilee
    Climate reparations to global south counties

      • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. I mean my point in selecting these is they’re all bare minimum responsible policy choices that are obviously needed, that an informed lib should agree to (maybe not the NATO one but still). Like this is not a list of things I actually believe should happen that list is much more expansive, but these are policies chosen to hopefully provoke cognitive dissonance.

  • T34 [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the W. E. B. Du Bois article:

    In 1956, I shall not go to the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no “two evils” exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can do or say. There is no third party. On the Presidential ballot in a few states (seventeen in 1952), a “Socialist” Party will appear. Few will hear its appeal because it will have almost no opportunity to take part in the campaign and explain its platform. If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by “force and violence.”

    The present Administration is carrying on the greatest preparation for war in the history of mankind. Stevenson promises to maintain or increase this effort. … The “other” party has surrendered all party differences in foreign affairs, and foreign affairs are our most important affairs today and take most of our taxes.

    Is the refusal to vote in this phony election a counsel of despair? No, it is dogged hope. It is hope that if twenty-five million voters refrain from voting in 1956 because of their own accord and not because of a sly wink from Khrushchev, this might make the American people ask how much longer this dumb farce can proceed without even a whimper of protest.

  • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tell them bluntly that only a couple dems have won my vote in the past decade, when they protest I bring up

    Police reform (Biden: “fund the police”)

    Abortion (Obama promised to enshrine it in law, 111th congress dems had a supermajority, did nothing)

    Supreme Court seats (at any point when the dems had the majority they could have forced it, instead we have today’s bullshit)

    Formerly student debt forgiveness (Bidens limp attemps have satisfied most of my lib friends)

    Federal Marijuana Legalization (rescheduling Marijuana can be done any day by the president*)

    Foreign policy failures (Iraq [Bush but dems supported], Libiya, Syria, Bolivia [Trump but dems supported], Yemen, Cuba)

    Drone strikes/Whistleblowers

    Capitulation towards republican tax ratcheting

    General tendency towards bipartisanship, thereby stopping actual reform (looking at you ACA)

  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Voting is useful and powerful but only as an organized and disciplined block that makes demands and doles out punishment to elected officials. Like unions used to and organizations like the DSA may someday develop the capacity for in the future.

  • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t take to long for me luckily enough so I do vote for hun, but I vote for whatever candidate I want to.

    If I like their policies then they will deserve my vote. I don’t vote on party lines. You have to earn my vote.

    I’m also referring mainly to local and state elections. Those at least matter quite a bit. Federal elections are complete spectacle and dogshit.

  • marti_abernathey@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You said ‘vote blue, no matter who’ and Democrats did nothing when they had power to change things. You blame Kristen Sinema and Joe Manchin. They are part of the ‘no matter who’ crew. Care to explain that?”

      • FakeNewsForDogs [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. I usually just walk away muttering to myself and shaking my head derisively after saying this, like they’re some kind of idiot, leaving them bewildered as they work out the math in their heads and start to wonder if perhaps I am significantly older than they thought.

  • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have friends all over the world, so the takes tend to vary a lot. Most of my uni friends were from China and have since moved back there, we tend to have pretty similiar politics. I live in Japan now and discussing who you are voting for would be a rarity, I don’t even really know how my partner votes. I don’t think I have ever met a single person in the country who was excited to vote for a LDP candidate.

    I do have friends in the states still, who tend to be the most vocal about this kind of thing. Most that I would truly consider a friend over there is fairly leftist. A few of the more liberal ones grudgingly vote Democrat, but none of them are excited about it or would try to convince me to do the same.

    I have acquantances who are shitlibs and are excited about their purple candidate of choice, but it’s not really worth getting into it over a guy I last saw in person five years ago.

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I parrot an old Beijer article, and say it’s fine for them to have that belief, but they should know it’s heterodox among US historians and academics.

    The impact of third parties on American politics extends far beyond their capacity to attract votes. Minor parties, historically, have been a source of important policy innovations. Women’s suffrage, the graduated income tax, and the direct election of senators, to name a few, were all issues that third parties espoused first.

    John D. Hicks,

    Let a third party once demonstrate that votes are to be made by adopting a certain demand, then one of the other parties can be trusted to absorb it. Ultimately, if the demand has merit, it will probably be translated into law or practice by the major party that has taken it up…The chronic supporter of third party tickets need not worry, therefore, when he is told, as he surely will be told, that he is “throwing away his vote.” [A] glance through American history would seem to indicate that his kind of vote is after all probably he most powerful vote that has ever been cast.

  • ghostOfRoux();@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty jaded about the whole thing so anymore I just vote for Not the Republican when it comes down to it.

    After talking to a few people in the Dem party, I think the writing is in the wall that they don’t wanna move left. Their “only goal is to win election” as one member put it. And they think that is to keep pushing old white dudes and show some pride flags in June.

    I’m gonna be slowly removing myself from the Dems anyway. I’m a sitting member of my local club and they just don’t wanna do anything. They keep asking how to get more young people involved and I keep telling them the young people are either socialist or alt-right. They aren’t gonna maintain a base unless they move left.

    I sent my app in to join the Marxist Unity Group this morning. And I’m reaching out to the local DSA chapter to see if they are dead and will gauge the possibility of reviving it. Anyone in this space in the Panhandle looking to get involved maybe reach out?

    TL:Dr; I vote for the old white guy with the blue on his sign because I’d be throwing my vote away regardless.

    • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By voting Democrat you are not just “throwing your vote away”, you are actively enabling warmongering and imperialism. It’s called the corporate uniparty for a reason, whichever you vote for you are still screwing over the working class. Stop falling for their scam.

        • ghostOfRoux();@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think I kinda agree with both of you on this. I def knew what I was voting for when I voted for Biden. Not happy at all but it wasn’t Trump. I’m in a deep red state “that is turning purple any day now” but that doesn’t really make good options for us comrades in any case. I think to clarify, I am throwing my vote away regardless of if I vote blue, red or 3rd party because that is our current system. 3rd party really isn’t feasible right now but we’ll see if the younger millennials and gen Zerrers keep pushing left(which I hope they do).

  • Star Wars Enjoyer @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    generally “no.”

    but if it’s someone I actually like, and want to help come to better stances, I’ll explain that it’s useless to care who the president is. The Senate and the supreme court matter more in terms of policy, and every single “left” leaning president has still been behind some vile shit.

    When they were telling us to “vote blue no matter who” back in 2019, I would calmly explain that Biden’s politics aren’t far off from Republican ones, and that his career spits in the face of what his supporters think of him.

    as it seems to me, the lines like “you’re just letting the conservatives win” and “if you don’t participate in the system you’re against the progress” are ultimately just things they tell themselves so they feel like they’re in some way useful. I would posit that most of them know, on some level, that voting doesn’t do anything of note. I would further posit that most of them know that they’re wasting their time caring about who the president is, but do it out of fear for the future. they lack the theory and the understanding to know that the existing system doesn’t include our voices, so like a person blinded by a dark room, they’re swinging around wildly in the hopes that they’ll hit something. A lot of them just need to be sat down and talked to in human terms, person to person. Enough of that and they’ll come around on their stances.

    • Cyber Ghost@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can we vote for members of the communist party? And you are saying that voting for the communist party makes no difference?

      • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you buy in to Lenin’s philosophy, voting for a (non-electoralist) communist party is good because they can direct the support into other outlets which can actually do good (mutual aid, dual power, general propogandizing)