Whilst technically immune now, assassinating them is still extremely polarising and likely to make martyrs, forever. And they won’t be able to justify the consequences of their decisions.

Re-arresting them constantly however, from the oval office, interfering with their civil liberties… They themselves would have to describe how it’s not an official act, and why the president shouldn’t be immune.

The moment they make a ruling… destroy their property, seize their assets, etc… Make their lives a living hell.

It’s still polarising, but makes them feel the consequences of their actions. And they’ll have to justify it in the public court of opinion for everyone to see to why this is a good thing.

Now I’m wondering what the minimum amount of water required to sustain the current levels of life on earth.

IPv4 isn’t depreciated, it’s exhausted. It’s still a key cornerstone of our current internet today.

We still have “modern” hardware being deployed with piss-poor IPv6 support (if any at all). Until that gets fixed, adoption rates will continue to be low. Adding warnings will only result in annoying people, not driving for improvement.

I’m assuming now that the Post Office is under criminal investigation for fraud, the mutual assistance act between UK and Australia might be used to compel her instead? Especially considering Vennels pointed the blame at her.

Assuming, of course, that the investigators deem her an important cog in the scandal too.

When you become the sole reason for global warming.

It’s targeted to bring the issue to the forefront of people’s minds before they vote.

They’re not trying to negotiate with the current government, they’re trying to gain support from the people voting the next government in, hoping they’d vote for a party sympathetic to their cause.

Genuine unpopular opinion and the people downvote it… In a community named “Unpopular Opinion”.

Surprised she didn’t freak out with the line below. It’s already gone on a killing spree…

That suggests his recent actions haven’t been delusional?

Like most of my work’s processes… Shit goes in, shit comes out…

Using a password manager would avoid this. Everyone should ideally use unique passwords per service, that way a single account can’t compromise the others.

The loss of personal data however is fricking annoying. If a company has no legitimate reason, I avoid signing up to them.

Looking at you Nvidia, Razar, etc…

I listened to it here: https://www.youtube.com/live/VdDNCDFpBtA

From about 6:47

There’s only so many 3-word slogans for “I’m a douchbag”

“When a mummy & daddy love each other very much…”

Whilst I agree in the spirit of the petition, the wording isn’t great.

Server infrastructure has significant opex costs to run & maintain - it’s impractical to demand publishers to keep them alive, especially if the running cost far exceeds the player demand & potential revenues. What happens if that publisher goes bust? What happens if a significant security vulnerability is found?

Might be better to have legislation for software publishers (not just games) to both plan & implement a sunsetting strategies when they intend to retire software.

Eg. If the online component was just performing license checks, make software publishers remove the DRM. If it’s to host a DLC store, release all DLC items for free & remove the store. If its for multi-player mechanics, release both the client & server software as limited open-source license so the community can maintain those assets going forward.

Dear America… | David Mitchell’s Soapbox

And a rate limit

That parody was awesome! If they turned it into a full movie I’d be the first to buy tickets to see it.

Wouldn’t the YouTube algorithm add an unintentionally bias into the training data?

A lot of YouTubers talk about how they’re having to adjust their content and style to maintain viewership numbers. Hence all the click bait thumbnails & captions.

Execs don’t give a shit. They simply double down on the false cause fallacy instead. They wouldn’t ever admit they fucked up.

Last year the company I work for went through a run of redundancies, claiming AI and system improvements were the cause. Before this point we were growing (slowly) year on year. Just not growing fast enough for the shareholders.

They cut too deep, shit is falling apart, and we’re loosing bids to competitors. Now they’ve doubled down on AI, claiming blindness to the systems issues they created, and just made an employee’s “Can Do” attitude a performance goal.